Alexios V Doukas has been listed as one of the
History good articles under the
good article criteria. If you can improve it further,
please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can
reassess it. Review: October 29, 2018. ( Reviewed version). |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
Miskin, why does this need cleanup? Adam Bishop 17:32, 5 March 2007 (UTC)
Maybe not a cleanup since there's nothing wrong with the content, but a good copyedit and structuring. I currently has no sections and gives the impression of a stub. Miskin 10:01, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
Well, now this has been moved back to a Latinized spelling, so it no longer matches all the other emperors. Now what? Adam Bishop ( talk) 08:37, 15 March 2008 (UTC)
The new article title fails to consider that the family name is covered in Doukas. Could you point me to the discussion on the renaming? The "Greek" spelling is actually the one used by the Oxford Dictionary of Byzantium and reflects more recent trends in English-language historiography.
On the matter of consistency, User:Srnec has started a more recent conversation on renaming articles on Byzantine Emperors for consistency reasons in Talk:List of Byzantine Emperors. I seem to be the only one bothering to answer so far. Your views on the subject would probably be better placed there than any talk page about an individual Emperor or Emperess. Dimadick ( talk) 08:32, 16 March 2008 (UTC)
An infobox is needed for Alexios V Doukas to fit with the infoboxes that the other Byzantine emperors have. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Senjuto ( talk • contribs) 17:32, 11 April 2011 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Gog the Mild ( talk · contribs) 10:56, 28 October 2018 (UTC)
Could you check that you are ok with my light copy edit. Thanks.
Images.
Sources
Prose
More to follow. Gog the Mild ( talk) 20:33, 28 October 2018 (UTC)
@ Urselius: That all looks good. I am a bit rushed right now, but hopefully will be able to have a final check this evening. Gog the Mild ( talk) 11:15, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
Good Article review progress box
|
Alexios V Doukas has been listed as one of the
History good articles under the
good article criteria. If you can improve it further,
please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can
reassess it. Review: October 29, 2018. ( Reviewed version). |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
Miskin, why does this need cleanup? Adam Bishop 17:32, 5 March 2007 (UTC)
Maybe not a cleanup since there's nothing wrong with the content, but a good copyedit and structuring. I currently has no sections and gives the impression of a stub. Miskin 10:01, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
Well, now this has been moved back to a Latinized spelling, so it no longer matches all the other emperors. Now what? Adam Bishop ( talk) 08:37, 15 March 2008 (UTC)
The new article title fails to consider that the family name is covered in Doukas. Could you point me to the discussion on the renaming? The "Greek" spelling is actually the one used by the Oxford Dictionary of Byzantium and reflects more recent trends in English-language historiography.
On the matter of consistency, User:Srnec has started a more recent conversation on renaming articles on Byzantine Emperors for consistency reasons in Talk:List of Byzantine Emperors. I seem to be the only one bothering to answer so far. Your views on the subject would probably be better placed there than any talk page about an individual Emperor or Emperess. Dimadick ( talk) 08:32, 16 March 2008 (UTC)
An infobox is needed for Alexios V Doukas to fit with the infoboxes that the other Byzantine emperors have. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Senjuto ( talk • contribs) 17:32, 11 April 2011 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Gog the Mild ( talk · contribs) 10:56, 28 October 2018 (UTC)
Could you check that you are ok with my light copy edit. Thanks.
Images.
Sources
Prose
More to follow. Gog the Mild ( talk) 20:33, 28 October 2018 (UTC)
@ Urselius: That all looks good. I am a bit rushed right now, but hopefully will be able to have a final check this evening. Gog the Mild ( talk) 11:15, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
Good Article review progress box
|