This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Soap Operas This article is within the scope of WikiProject Soap Operas, an effort to build consistent guidelines for and improve articles about soap operas and telenovelas on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit this article, or visit WikiProject Soap Operas, where you can join the project and/or the discussion.Soap OperasWikipedia:WikiProject Soap OperasTemplate:WikiProject Soap Operassoap opera articles Television Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Fictional characters This article is within the scope of WikiProject Fictional characters, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of fictional characters on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Fictional charactersWikipedia:WikiProject Fictional charactersTemplate:WikiProject Fictional charactersfictional character articles

this image should be removed unless it can be substituted by a decent one. it is so bad it doesn't convey anything relevant to the article except a brown blob. FoCuSandLeArN ( talk) 20:45, 27 July 2012 (UTC) reply

How is a brown blob relevant to the article? -- OhNoPeedyPeebles ( talk) 23:27, 14 January 2017 (UTC) reply

Glad others than me and @ Conquistador2k6: had concerns. Unfortunately it has taken 13 years for this issue to be addressed. It took 5 minutes to find a better alternative. The fact that the original uploader @ Mtaylor848: had the audacity to add it back twice and argue it was "the best we have" is unfathomable. It was so pixelated I would have needed to have been squinting on Pluto to make out it was illustrating a human. Rain the 1 23:25, 29 March 2023 (UTC) reply

Squinting on Pluto! lol

I think someone must have taken that picture with a Potato! Conquistador2k6 ( talk) 12:25, 30 March 2023 (UTC) reply