This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Aviation This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation articles This article has not yet been checked against the criteria for B-class status: Referencing and citation: not checked Coverage and accuracy: not checked Structure: not checked Grammar and style: not checked Supporting materials: not checked To fill out this checklist, please add the following code to the template call: | b1<!--Referencing and citation--> = <yes/no> | b2<!--Coverage and accuracy   --> = <yes/no> | b3<!--Structure               --> = <yes/no> | b4<!--Grammar and style       --> = <yes/no> | b5<!--Supporting materials    --> = <yes/no> assessing the article against each criterion. Chemicals Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chemicals, a daughter project of WikiProject Chemistry, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of chemicals. To participate, help improve this article or visit the project page for details on the project.ChemicalsWikipedia:WikiProject ChemicalsTemplate:WikiProject Chemicalschemicals articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Environment Low‑importance This environment-related article is part of the WikiProject Environment to improve Wikipedia's coverage of the environment. The aim is to write neutral and well-referenced articles on environment-related topics, as well as to ensure that environment articles are properly categorized. Read Wikipedia:Contributing FAQ and leave any messages at the project talk page.EnvironmentWikipedia:WikiProject EnvironmentTemplate:WikiProject EnvironmentEnvironment articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Medicine: Toxicology Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by the Toxicology task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Freezing point. I removed some defective information from this paragraph. Freezing points increase not decrease with dilution. As a result, the information provided (undiluted -30 C, diluted -55 C) could not be correct. Rklawton ( talk) 17:15, 24 December 2008 (UTC) reply

Disagree. I reverted the change and added a reference discussing the "eutectic" point of a mixture. Steve torquay ( talk) 07:09, 24 January 2009 (UTC) reply

The source you added CLEARLY states that adding anti-freeze reduces the freezing point. This article, on the other hand, clearly and incorrectly stated that adding WATER reduces the freezing point. It doesn't. Rklawton ( talk) 22:52, 24 January 2009 (UTC) reply

I invite you to have a look at some commercial product data sheets, for example page 12 of the Dow UCAR Deicing Fluid Datasheet. You will see that at 100% concentration of the fluid, the freezing point is -28C. As you add water, the freezing point (surprisingly) decreases, reaching a minimum below -55C at a mixture of 70% fluid and 30% water. Adding yet more water then raises the freezing point, obviously reaching 0C at a mixture of 0% fluid and 100% water. Steve torquay ( talk) 04:25, 26 January 2009 (UTC) reply

My bad. Thanks for clarifying that. Rklawton ( talk) 02:42, 27 January 2009 (UTC) reply

I believe with most brands of fluids, there is a dilution range were the fluid will operate to its maximum efficiency depending on the ambient conditions. High glycol content fluids have a tendency to have lower freezing points. In particular I understand that Canada has great difficulty using type II and Type IV fluids and revert to using Type I. Now although the holdover time is poor on Type I because it has low viscosity and behaves like a Newtonian fluid the airport infrastructure is set up in many cases that the aircraft can spray and take-off almost immediately. I am aware that LOUT figures can be significantly different from the nominal values. Unfortunately not many de-icing providers in Europe will provide a LOUT test when the temperatures are below -25 degrees Celsius. Safewing ( talk) 22:33, 20 December 2009 (UTC) reply

IHS Shows : ISO 11074 Soil quality - Vocabulary - Second Edition, suggest should be ISO 11078 only. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 165.225.38.188 ( talk) 16:28, 11 June 2019 (UTC) reply

Can I just ask where the abbreviation ADF comes from? I've never seen it other than where it means Automatic Direction Finder. 212.183.128.33 ( talk) 15:24, 5 November 2012 (UTC) reply

Note: There is now another article with this title due to a bold split in June 2022. SilverLocust 💬 22:34, 11 August 2023 (UTC) reply