This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

California High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject CaliforniaCalifornia articles High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. National Register of Historic Places High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject National Register of Historic Places, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of U.S. historic sites listed on the National Register of Historic Places on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.National Register of Historic PlacesWikipedia:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesTemplate:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesNational Register of Historic Places articles High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. World Heritage Sites ( inactive) This article is within the scope of WikiProject World Heritage Sites, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.World Heritage SitesWikipedia:WikiProject World Heritage SitesTemplate:WikiProject World Heritage SitesWorld Heritage Sites articles United States History Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the history of the United States on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United States HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject United States HistoryTemplate:WikiProject United States HistoryUnited States History articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. WikiProject United States History To-do: history watch purge Here are some tasks awaiting attention: Cleanup : United States History articles needing attention Infobox : United States History articles needing infoboxes Stubs : Stub-Class United States History articles, Category:United States history stubs Other : Place either of the following WikiProject banners on United States History-related articles and assess: {{ WikiProject United States History|class=|importance=}} {{ WikiProject United States|class=|importance=|UShistory=Yes|UShistory-importance=}} United States: Old West High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject American Old West (assessed as High-importance). Historic sites Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Historic sites, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of historic sites on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Historic sitesWikipedia:WikiProject Historic sitesTemplate:WikiProject Historic sitesHistoric sites articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

On 26 June 2023, it was proposed that this article be moved to The Ahwahnee. The result of the discussion was not moved.

The history of a major National Park concession history is overlooked by lack of material and this unfortunate redirect. Granted The Ahwahnee Hotel remains one of the company's primary architectural legacies, but numerous fascinating personalities, artistic accomplishments, supreme court victories, contentious positions, and cultural histories are overlooked without its own page. Can no one support developing a better history for National Park concessions? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2602:30A:2E05:F470:2CBA:6DBD:FF32:D396 ( talk) 06:31, 20 January 2016 (UTC) reply

On its page, it never claims 5 star status. It does claim to be four-diamond-rated by AAA (out of 5). I also cross checked the following:

• Orbitz: 3/5 stars
• Travelocity: just mentions the AAA 4/5 diamonds

For these reasons, I have struck the 5-star comments until a credible source is added. -- Bobak 22:08, 10 August 2006 (UTC) reply

I worked in the Ahwahnee back in the day, and although I heard people talk about 4/5 star ratings, nothing I read ever said so. Even IF royalty, presidents, and movie stars have eaten there! I would be surprised if it was 4 stars, I might consider 3 stars. While I was there: Billy Idol, the guy from Men's Warehouse, Molly Ringwald, one of the Princesses Di or Furgie.) -- Billy Nair ( talk) 00:24, 20 February 2008 (UTC) reply

The Ahwahnee hotel is a four diamonds property. Star rating are rated by the public based on the experience they had (customer service, quality of beds, etc). Diamond ratings are rated by American Automobile Association (AAA). Diamond ratings are based on the basic need requirements and how luxurious the property is based on AAA requirements. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 198.183.184.25 ( talk) 21:07, 1 February 2012 (UTC) reply

I believe the architectural style is "Arts & Crafts" — Preceding unsigned comment added by 109.251.102.152 ( talk) 19:45, 18 July 2011 (UTC) reply

I was digging for more information on this Federal lawsuit: Jilted Yosemite National Park concessions suitor goes to court and was disappointed that there wasn't enough history of the ownership here to help me understand that case. Can it be added? (Should it?) As well as, perhaps, a brief summation of the lawsuit itself? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:645:4000:7A80:B4A7:2773:15F0:3902 ( talk) 01:57, 24 September 2015 (UTC) reply

The Yosemite Park & Curry Company redirect is targeted at this page, whereas the effectively identical Yosemite Park and Curry Company is redirected to the Yosemite National Park. Could someone who knows about this sort out that mess? (I'm posting an identical note in the talk section of the latter page, too.) Meanwhile, Curry Company doesn't even have a page, and isn't a redirect to anything. MrRedwood ( talk) 23:39, 15 January 2016 (UTC) reply

• Meanwhile, Curry Company doesn't even have a page, and isn't a redirect to anything.
  • OK.-- Mark Miller ( talk) 03:34, 16 March 2016 (UTC) reply
  • Both redirects have been changed. Yosemite Park & Curry Company now redirects to basically the same place but under the specific subsection "The Currys" to give the full details and background of the two companies and Yosemite Park and Curry Company now redirects to the subsection "Yosemite Park & Curry Company" for that specific spelling of the name. Curry Company now redirects to "The Currys".-- Mark Miller ( talk) 03:46, 16 March 2016 (UTC) reply

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Ahwahnee Hotel. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080208100006/http://tps.cr.nps.gov/nhl/detail.cfm?ResourceId=1715&ResourceType=Building to http://tps.cr.nps.gov/nhl/detail.cfm?ResourceId=1715&ResourceType=Building
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060716234712/http://www.cr.nps.gov/history/online_books/harrison/harrison15.htm to http://www.cr.nps.gov/history/online_books/harrison/harrison15.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{ source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 12:17, 28 June 2017 (UTC) reply