This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This page has been
transwikied to
Wiktionary. The article has content that is useful at Wiktionary. Therefore the article can be found at either here or here ( logs 1 logs 2.) Note: This means that the article has been copied to the Wiktionary Transwiki namespace for evaluation and formatting. It does not mean that the article is in the Wiktionary main namespace, or that it has been removed from Wikipedia's. Furthermore, the Wiktionarians might delete the article from Wiktionary if they do not find it to be appropriate for the Wiktionary. Removing this tag will usually trigger CopyToWiktionaryBot to re-transwiki the entry. This article should have been removed from Category:Copy to Wiktionary and should not be re-added there. |
-- CopyToWiktionaryBot 17:34, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
It should say by the cost of equity at the end instead of cost of assets. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.234.20.90 ( talk) 02:18, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
I cannot find references to the work conducted by Prof. peccati on the APV. The università bocconi lists his books, but none before 1973. being born in 1944 he was 29 at the time of Meyers (1973). Did not find any publciation before 1992.
Unless more info provided, the Peccati Reference should be removed - The Lone Ranger Hit me with a good one! 17:00, 23 April 2008 (UTC)
The discount rate for the tax shield is stated as the cost of debt. This is not widely accepted anymore. See for instance page 13 of this paper: http://www.iese.edu/research/pdfs/DI-0488-E.pdf It shows that a number of academics now also present methods whereby the cost of equity unlevered is used to discount the tax shield benefits. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 134.146.0.41 ( talk) 09:07, 28 April 2011 (UTC)
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This page has been
transwikied to
Wiktionary. The article has content that is useful at Wiktionary. Therefore the article can be found at either here or here ( logs 1 logs 2.) Note: This means that the article has been copied to the Wiktionary Transwiki namespace for evaluation and formatting. It does not mean that the article is in the Wiktionary main namespace, or that it has been removed from Wikipedia's. Furthermore, the Wiktionarians might delete the article from Wiktionary if they do not find it to be appropriate for the Wiktionary. Removing this tag will usually trigger CopyToWiktionaryBot to re-transwiki the entry. This article should have been removed from Category:Copy to Wiktionary and should not be re-added there. |
-- CopyToWiktionaryBot 17:34, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
It should say by the cost of equity at the end instead of cost of assets. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.234.20.90 ( talk) 02:18, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
I cannot find references to the work conducted by Prof. peccati on the APV. The università bocconi lists his books, but none before 1973. being born in 1944 he was 29 at the time of Meyers (1973). Did not find any publciation before 1992.
Unless more info provided, the Peccati Reference should be removed - The Lone Ranger Hit me with a good one! 17:00, 23 April 2008 (UTC)
The discount rate for the tax shield is stated as the cost of debt. This is not widely accepted anymore. See for instance page 13 of this paper: http://www.iese.edu/research/pdfs/DI-0488-E.pdf It shows that a number of academics now also present methods whereby the cost of equity unlevered is used to discount the tax shield benefits. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 134.146.0.41 ( talk) 09:07, 28 April 2011 (UTC)