This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
On 11 August 2022, it was proposed that this article be moved to Adarnase IV, King of the Iberians. The result of the discussion was no consensus. |
The result of the move request was: no consensus. ( closed by non-admin page mover) — Ceso femmuin mbolgaig mbung, mello hi! ( 投稿) 21:56, 2 September 2022 (UTC)
– Adarnase IV restored an abolished monarchy under the name of Kingdom of the Iberians. All the kings were titled so, until the Georgian unification when Bagrat III took over riegns of the several crowns who would effectively become an all-Georgian monarch. Before Bagrat III, all his forefathers back to Adarnase IV were rulers under the name of "King of the Iberians" and not "King of Iberia". An emperor /// Ave 20:01, 11 August 2022 (UTC) — Relisting. Extraordinary Writ ( talk) 03:02, 19 August 2022 (UTC) — Relisting. – robertsky ( talk) 04:15, 26 August 2022 (UTC)
Question - is the area they ruled called "Iberia"? Fredlesaltique ( talk) 13:14, 19 August 2022 (UTC)
It see your point that they are slightly different. I'm not opposed, but just want to make sure that it's necessary in the title. Do other English sources make a distinction between "Kingdom of Iberia" and "Kingdom of the Iberians"? It seems like the Wikipedia:Naming conventions (royalty and nobility) recommends against it, but it's not set in stone. "In most cases, the name of the state is used rather than the form that appears in the monarch's actual title. For example, Constantine I of Greece not "of the Hellenes" and Henry I of England not "of the English". Fredlesaltique ( talk) 23:03, 19 August 2022 (UTC)
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
On 11 August 2022, it was proposed that this article be moved to Adarnase IV, King of the Iberians. The result of the discussion was no consensus. |
The result of the move request was: no consensus. ( closed by non-admin page mover) — Ceso femmuin mbolgaig mbung, mello hi! ( 投稿) 21:56, 2 September 2022 (UTC)
– Adarnase IV restored an abolished monarchy under the name of Kingdom of the Iberians. All the kings were titled so, until the Georgian unification when Bagrat III took over riegns of the several crowns who would effectively become an all-Georgian monarch. Before Bagrat III, all his forefathers back to Adarnase IV were rulers under the name of "King of the Iberians" and not "King of Iberia". An emperor /// Ave 20:01, 11 August 2022 (UTC) — Relisting. Extraordinary Writ ( talk) 03:02, 19 August 2022 (UTC) — Relisting. – robertsky ( talk) 04:15, 26 August 2022 (UTC)
Question - is the area they ruled called "Iberia"? Fredlesaltique ( talk) 13:14, 19 August 2022 (UTC)
It see your point that they are slightly different. I'm not opposed, but just want to make sure that it's necessary in the title. Do other English sources make a distinction between "Kingdom of Iberia" and "Kingdom of the Iberians"? It seems like the Wikipedia:Naming conventions (royalty and nobility) recommends against it, but it's not set in stone. "In most cases, the name of the state is used rather than the form that appears in the monarch's actual title. For example, Constantine I of Greece not "of the Hellenes" and Henry I of England not "of the English". Fredlesaltique ( talk) 23:03, 19 August 2022 (UTC)