This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Articles for creation C‑class This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles C This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible. This article was accepted on 27 August 2013 by reviewer Tom Morris ( talk · contribs). Feminism Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Feminism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Feminism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FeminismWikipedia:WikiProject FeminismTemplate:WikiProject FeminismFeminism articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Technology This article is within the scope of WikiProject Technology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TechnologyWikipedia:WikiProject TechnologyTemplate:WikiProject TechnologyTechnology articles Women This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WomenWikipedia:WikiProject WomenTemplate:WikiProject WomenWikiProject Women articles

Glad to see this article started! It would be good to expand with information from more independent, reliable sources. I'm adding a few I have found below; if anybody new to Wikipedia is interested in pitching in, here's a short video I recently made on how to find sources suitable for Wikipedia.

• http://www.itwire.com/opinion-and-analysis/open-sauce/52141-adacamp-set-to-kick-off-in-melbourne
• http://www.techworld.com.au/article/412308/adacamp_aims_boost_women_participation_open_tech/
• (in Dutch): http://computerworld.nl/business-intelligence/75270-groep-pleit-voor-meer-dames-in-open-source

- Pete ( talk) 18:45, 27 August 2013 (UTC) reply

Thanks! I added the two English-language references. Also possibly helpful for future expansion, this photo of AdaCamp SF's red/yellow/green lanyards has a Wikipedia-compatible license and could be helpful to include. The article may be too short for multiple photos right now though. Dreamyshade ( talk) 10:35, 30 August 2013 (UTC) reply

(conflict of interest: I was president of Wikimedia Australia during this time). It would be good to note the supporters of these events, which for the first AdaCamp were Google, Wikimedia Australia, Linux Australia and Atlassian (also Australian). (per ITwire article Pete mentions above). John Vandenberg ^{( chat)} 04:28, 8 October 2013 (UTC) reply