This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Magazines Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Magazines, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of magazines on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MagazinesWikipedia:WikiProject MagazinesTemplate:WikiProject Magazinesmagazine articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. See WikiProject Magazines' writing guide for tips on how to improve this article. Computing: RISC OS Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is within the scope of the RISC OS task force, a task force which is currently considered to be inactive. This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool as Stub-class because it uses a stub template. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the |auto= parameter.

Is it OK to claim it was the second longest running UK computer mag at the time of it's closure, without giving a reference? A reference is required. 92.21.206.130 ( talk) 17:26, 19 March 2016 (UTC) reply

You are correct, for such a definitive and arguably Wikipedia:Wikipuffery statement a reference would be needed. A quick check couldn't find one so I've removed it for now. Flibble ( talk) 20:56, 19 March 2016 (UTC) reply