This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
Medicine Mid‑importance This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine articles Mid This redirect has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

I think that acne scar treatment should logically belong in acne scarring. It would make the latter page more comprehensive, and I think it's useless to have a separate treatment page when the content could easily be copied into the scarring page. Aristotle1990 ( talk) 19:51, 22 January 2008 (UTC) reply

Agreed. -- SilyOlPooh ( talk) 02:49, 25 January 2008 (UTC) reply

I second the motion. Dictouray ( talk) 05:21, 25 January 2008 (UTC) reply

Completely agree. -- Pbroks13 07:43, 13 February 2008 (UTC) reply

This is right --08:36, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[Raman Chalotra]

Both should be merged into acne vulgaris, the parent article. B.Wind ( talk) 04:56, 18 March 2008 (UTC) reply

Makes sense to merge the two —Preceding unsigned comment added by Tpwood ( talk • contribs) 20:56, 15 May 2008 (UTC) reply

agreed. Mahanmd ( talk) 03:11, 16 May 2008 (UTC) reply

Really one of the most biased entries on Wikipedia to serve the cosmetic enhancement industry. The page reads unabashedly like an advertisement by the practitioners. Silas10961 ( talk) 11:49, 25 September 2008 (UTC) reply

 Done acne scar treatment was essentially word for word copy of this article, so merged together. Now to consider issue of merging into Acne#Treatment... David Ruben ^Talk

How about one? I want to know what it looks like. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.180.237.81 ( talk) 18:26, 2 November 2008 (UTC) hello —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.62.147.96 ( talk) 02:29, 4 August 2009 (UTC) reply