This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Abortion Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Abortion, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Abortion on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AbortionWikipedia:WikiProject AbortionTemplate:WikiProject AbortionAbortion articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Law Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Feminism Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Feminism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Feminism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FeminismWikipedia:WikiProject FeminismTemplate:WikiProject FeminismFeminism articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Women's History Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women's history and related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women's HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject Women's HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Women's HistoryWomen's History articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Women This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WomenWikipedia:WikiProject WomenTemplate:WikiProject WomenWikiProject Women articles Gender studies Low‑importance This article is part of WikiProject Gender studies. This WikiProject aims to improve the quality of articles dealing with gender studies and to remove systematic gender bias from Wikipedia. If you would like to participate in the project, you can choose to edit this article, or visit the project page for more information.Gender studiesWikipedia:WikiProject Gender studiesTemplate:WikiProject Gender studiesGender studies articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. To-do list: Here are some tasks awaiting attention: Assess : see Unassessed Gender studies articles and Unknown-importance Gender studies articles Cleanup : edit to see Collaborate : see /Collaboration Copyedit : edit to see Deletion sorting : see /Sexuality and gender Expand : edit to see Infobox : see Gender studies articles needing infoboxes Merge : edit to see Notability : edit to see NPOV : edit to see Orphans : Brannon Masculinity Scale · Domestic violence in lesbian relationships · Holy Virility · Media and gender · Michael Kaufman (author) · Women's education in Saudi Arabia Photo : see Wikipedia requested photographs of gender studies Split : History of feminism Stubs : see Gender studies stubs Translate : see /translation Update : edit to see Verify : Riot grrrl Needs attention : see Gender studies articles needing attention Ohio Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ohio, which collaborates on Ohio-related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to current discussions.OhioWikipedia:WikiProject OhioTemplate:WikiProject OhioOhio articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Women's Health Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's Health, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women's Health on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women's HealthWikipedia:WikiProject Women's HealthTemplate:WikiProject Women's Healthwomen's health articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale. Medicine: Reproductive Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by the Reproductive medicine task force (assessed as Low-importance). Philosophy: Ethics / Social and political Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Associated task forces: /  Ethics Social and political philosophy Sexology and sexuality Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sexology and sexuality, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of human sexuality on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Sexology and sexualityWikipedia:WikiProject Sexology and sexualityTemplate:WikiProject Sexology and sexualitySexology and sexuality articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Human rights Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Human rights, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Human rights on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Human rightsWikipedia:WikiProject Human rightsTemplate:WikiProject Human rightsHuman rights articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Death Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Death, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Death on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DeathWikipedia:WikiProject DeathTemplate:WikiProject DeathDeath articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

The contentious topics procedure applies to this page. This page is related to abortion, which is a contentious topic. Please consult the procedures and edit carefully.

	Women in Red: 2019
This article was created or improved as part of the Women in Red project in 2019. The editor(s) involved may be new; please assume good faith regarding their contributions before making changes.Women in RedWikipedia:WikiProject Women in RedTemplate:WikiProject Women in RedWomen in Red articles

Daily pageviews of this article A graph should have been displayed here but graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at pageviews.wmcloud.org

Abortion status post July 2019 is unclear to me in this article. It appears to be written prior to July 2019 and anticipate the 'heartbeat' law would go into effect in July 2019, but I don't know it that is the case. I did find https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-abortion-ohio/u-s-judge-blocks-ohio-heartbeat-law-to-end-most-abortions-idUSKCN1TY2PK which says a federal judge blocked the Ohio 'heartbeat' law in July of 2019. I don't know if there has been additional legal action. Gouncbeatduke ( talk) 13:24, 20 October 2019 (UTC) reply

Related to the topic that is hanging in this Talk page: The current Ohio law has not been legally interpreted by third-parties since the law went into effect in July 2019, at least to my research. This Wiki page was updated with a current interpretation, citing the ORC directly. The letter of the law matches up, so I am appropriately adjusting the page. Please discuss if you have other interpretations of the law text, not an outdated article. Jamberpilot ( talk) 05:09, 5 May 2022 (UTC) reply

Clinics in Ohio are currently offering legal abortions to women who request them up to 22 weeks LMP. This is an objective and indisputable fact. VictimOfEntropy ( talk) 05:14, 5 May 2022 (UTC) reply

Okay, I see what you're trying to say now. However, you could have made the proper adjustments to reinsert that rather than vandalize legitimate information. The current (22 week LMP) is based on current legal status, not Ohio code. If the federal courts change stance, it would fall to the heartbeat law. That's my bad for not including that for 'current' , however you could have simply reinserted that. Your approach to immediate reversion was belligerent. All information should be provided. Jamberpilot ( talk) 05:23, 5 May 2022 (UTC) reply

You are the only vandal here, Jamberpilot. You crated this account after you started vandalizing this page with false and deliberately misleading information. VictimOfEntropy ( talk) 05:28, 5 May 2022 (UTC) reply

This account is from 2015. I think you may need some sleep. Please stop being unreasonable. We're here to deliver good information in good spirit, and it's clear you aren't. Jamberpilot ( talk) 05:36, 5 May 2022 (UTC) reply

Luckily I and another user were able to catch and revert your vandalism both as an IP and with this account relatively quickly. Hopefully no one was mislead by your false information. VictimOfEntropy ( talk) 05:30, 5 May 2022 (UTC) reply

Stop accusing me of what you yourself are guilty of, Jamberpilot. You only switched to this account after your IP vandalism was undone. VictimOfEntropy ( talk) 05:52, 5 May 2022 (UTC) reply

Updated with the appropriate information, so we can close this thread now. Thank for your service. Jamberpilot ( talk) 06:46, 5 May 2022 (UTC) reply

So you are lying again. You are continuing to vandalize after leaving that message and seeing this: https://www.npr.org/sections/health-shots/2021/09/02/1033727679/fetal-heartbeat-isnt-a-medical-term-but-its-still-used-in-laws-on-abortion VictimOfEntropy ( talk) 07:12, 5 May 2022 (UTC) reply

Both of you, please stop accusing each other of lying and of vandalism; those sorts of accusations should not be made at article talk pages.

Jamberpilot, you need to take a look at WP:OR and WP:PRIMARY. I only glanced briefly at the edits you wanted to make, but it looks like you were writing content based on your own interpretation of state legal codes - that would not strike me as being appropriate. Either way, your changes have been contested, so you will need to establish a consensus for the challenged material to be included. Girth Summit _(blether) 08:15, 5 May 2022 (UTC) reply