From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Indoor Aviary

184.79.191.112 (are you also Pittytots, and just forgot to log in?): Please do not just delete information about an aviary that, from the existence of a picture, was or is part of the zoo. If it was part of the zoo and was replaced by the Discovery center (one interpretation of what I read in the news), then that should be noted in the History section, and the photo possibly moved up there. Too much history gets lost because things like this are simply deleted rather than explained. Then, if possible, a description about the current bird facilities should be inserted. The zoo web site and Abilene news were somewhat unhelpful in determining some of these issues remotely, so help from someone "on the ground" is appreciated, but please explain yourself. Thank you. Donlammers ( talk) 10:40, 8 September 2010 (UTC) reply

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Indoor Aviary

184.79.191.112 (are you also Pittytots, and just forgot to log in?): Please do not just delete information about an aviary that, from the existence of a picture, was or is part of the zoo. If it was part of the zoo and was replaced by the Discovery center (one interpretation of what I read in the news), then that should be noted in the History section, and the photo possibly moved up there. Too much history gets lost because things like this are simply deleted rather than explained. Then, if possible, a description about the current bird facilities should be inserted. The zoo web site and Abilene news were somewhat unhelpful in determining some of these issues remotely, so help from someone "on the ground" is appreciated, but please explain yourself. Thank you. Donlammers ( talk) 10:40, 8 September 2010 (UTC) reply


Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook