 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||
I have (anonymously) added references to three gravely negative reviews of this novel, two of them being from newspapers of a common ownership. And have altered the words "postive reviews" to "mixed reviews" in the introductory paragraph. Please discuss here if wish to revert this change. Granta80 ( talk) 19:48, 23 August 2020 (UTC)
Please discuss here if *you wish to revert this change. Granta80 ( talk) 19:51, 23 August 2020 (UTC)
- Seems OK to me but the issue that you edit has caused is that there are now seven sources following a simple statement. WP:OVERCITE OR WP:REFBOMBING might apply. The best thing would be to break out these articles into the existing Critical Reception section, with some explanatory text. ThatMontrealIP ( talk) 20:00, 23 August 2020 (UTC)
Oh, I just added a fourth one! I am reprhasing that sentence now, in order to split the references. Would expand the critical reception heading in a couple of days. Granta80 ( talk) 20:44, 23 August 2020 (UTC)
|
| This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||
I have (anonymously) added references to three gravely negative reviews of this novel, two of them being from newspapers of a common ownership. And have altered the words "postive reviews" to "mixed reviews" in the introductory paragraph. Please discuss here if wish to revert this change. Granta80 ( talk) 19:48, 23 August 2020 (UTC)
Please discuss here if *you wish to revert this change. Granta80 ( talk) 19:51, 23 August 2020 (UTC)
- Seems OK to me but the issue that you edit has caused is that there are now seven sources following a simple statement. WP:OVERCITE OR WP:REFBOMBING might apply. The best thing would be to break out these articles into the existing Critical Reception section, with some explanatory text. ThatMontrealIP ( talk) 20:00, 23 August 2020 (UTC)
Oh, I just added a fourth one! I am reprhasing that sentence now, in order to split the references. Would expand the critical reception heading in a couple of days. Granta80 ( talk) 20:44, 23 August 2020 (UTC)