This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Conservatism Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Conservatism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of conservatism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ConservatismWikipedia:WikiProject ConservatismTemplate:WikiProject ConservatismConservatism articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Books This article is within the scope of WikiProject Books. To participate in the project, please visit its page, where you can join the project and discuss matters related to book articles. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the relevant guideline for the type of work.BooksWikipedia:WikiProject BooksTemplate:WikiProject BooksBook articles

As the author of this book, I have taken great care to give as neutral an account of it as possible, though I am of course aware that total neutrality about one's own work is impossible. . I appreciate that some editors will find it objectionable that I have written this entry at all. I understand this, but urge such critics to respond not by deleting the article but by improving it. I think the book contains a number of important arguments and some valuable facts, and researchers should be aware of its existence. Peter Hitchens, logged in as Clockback ( talk) 13:38, 14 January 2010 (UTC) reply