 | A fact from A (motor yacht) appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the
Did you know column on 1 March 2012 (
check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|  |
 | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
| ||||||||
— Preceding unsigned comment added by DeLarge ( talk • contribs) 22:40, 22 February 2012 (UTC)
I've more or less restored the former version of the article, with the following changes:
- Rick Spilman, author of the Old Salt blog, is a regularly published Salon.com and HuffPost journalist as well as a maritime blogger, so I don't think he's non-notable or unreliable. I only used his blog for supporting citations, so nothing depends on him for reliability, merely supplementary verification (as well as online confirmation of Pelly's quote).
- I restored the old title of the Sunday Times article. Don't know how Factiva is formatted, but the only place on the web that the headline appears in that word order is this page; everywhere else seems to favour the former.
- I rejigged the ==Reception==. The idea of the style is Pro / Anti / Ambivalent, hence why the WSJ's Frank had his own paragraph. However, I've left him blended in with the critics. I also kept the amended style which promotes the first two critics based on their greater notability, but I don't think there's harm in restoring Mello's opinion. He may not be all that renowned, but it wasn't just a random blog post, it was an article in a dedicated maritime blog that's been on the go for 5-6 years.
I'll be running this through the GA assessment shortly anyway, so the article's likely to evolve and expand further anyway. -- DeLarge ( talk) 14:16, 3 March 2012 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on A (motor yacht). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20101213003802/http://blohmvossyachts.com/anhaenge/sonstige_anhaenge/motor_yacht_a.pdf to http://www.blohmvossyachts.com/anhaenge/sonstige_anhaenge/motor_yacht_a.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}).
An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.— cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 05:27, 27 May 2016 (UTC)
Should the port of registry now be blanked out, given that Hamilton have now de-registered it (same with M/Y A)? Wagnerp16 ( talk) 10:07, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
|
| A fact from A (motor yacht) appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the
Did you know column on 1 March 2012 (
check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
| |
|
| This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
| ||||||||
— Preceding unsigned comment added by DeLarge ( talk • contribs) 22:40, 22 February 2012 (UTC)
I've more or less restored the former version of the article, with the following changes:
- Rick Spilman, author of the Old Salt blog, is a regularly published Salon.com and HuffPost journalist as well as a maritime blogger, so I don't think he's non-notable or unreliable. I only used his blog for supporting citations, so nothing depends on him for reliability, merely supplementary verification (as well as online confirmation of Pelly's quote).
- I restored the old title of the Sunday Times article. Don't know how Factiva is formatted, but the only place on the web that the headline appears in that word order is this page; everywhere else seems to favour the former.
- I rejigged the ==Reception==. The idea of the style is Pro / Anti / Ambivalent, hence why the WSJ's Frank had his own paragraph. However, I've left him blended in with the critics. I also kept the amended style which promotes the first two critics based on their greater notability, but I don't think there's harm in restoring Mello's opinion. He may not be all that renowned, but it wasn't just a random blog post, it was an article in a dedicated maritime blog that's been on the go for 5-6 years.
I'll be running this through the GA assessment shortly anyway, so the article's likely to evolve and expand further anyway. -- DeLarge ( talk) 14:16, 3 March 2012 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on A (motor yacht). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20101213003802/http://blohmvossyachts.com/anhaenge/sonstige_anhaenge/motor_yacht_a.pdf to http://www.blohmvossyachts.com/anhaenge/sonstige_anhaenge/motor_yacht_a.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}).
An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.— cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 05:27, 27 May 2016 (UTC)
Should the port of registry now be blanked out, given that Hamilton have now de-registered it (same with M/Y A)? Wagnerp16 ( talk) 10:07, 5 July 2022 (UTC)