This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of
India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women writers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
women writers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women writersWikipedia:WikiProject Women writersTemplate:WikiProject Women writersWomen writers articles
The prose, spelling, and grammar is of good quality. I made some wording edits to improve grammar and readability in reviewing the article. The article generally follows MoS for word choice, lead, layout, etc.
The article covers the entire timeline of Mathai's research and writing process up until release and reception of the book. Is there any more detail you'd want to add to the Summary section? The other sections provide comprehensive coverage of those aspects, so perhaps fleshing out the Summary section would make it proportionate in size and detail to the others.
The article follows
WP:NPOV. The background and release section describes Mathai's challenges in contacting the author in a neutral manner. critical reception section highlights both negative and positive reviews without editorial bias.
It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.:
There is no indication of edit wars in the edit history or on the article talk page.
It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of
India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women writers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
women writers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women writersWikipedia:WikiProject Women writersTemplate:WikiProject Women writersWomen writers articles
The prose, spelling, and grammar is of good quality. I made some wording edits to improve grammar and readability in reviewing the article. The article generally follows MoS for word choice, lead, layout, etc.
The article covers the entire timeline of Mathai's research and writing process up until release and reception of the book. Is there any more detail you'd want to add to the Summary section? The other sections provide comprehensive coverage of those aspects, so perhaps fleshing out the Summary section would make it proportionate in size and detail to the others.
The article follows
WP:NPOV. The background and release section describes Mathai's challenges in contacting the author in a neutral manner. critical reception section highlights both negative and positive reviews without editorial bias.
It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.:
There is no indication of edit wars in the edit history or on the article talk page.
It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.