This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
A-Space article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, defense, traveled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
My main concern(s) now is/are that the intro section is long enough to be a good stub articel on its own and rather overwhelming. The first paragraph of it would make a good intro and the rest of the information could be another section, or follow the ToC.
Secondly, some phrases sound a little "popular press"-ish (EG. "If all this sounds incredibly expensive", "That's why the site", etc.).
Having said that, I appreciate the tone of your message and the quality of the articel's contents. 68.39.174.238 ( talk) 20:47, 27 April 2008 (UTC)
The section on tactical user needs does not appear to have anything to do with A-Space. I read the references, which do not describe A-Space.
There is also another more recent reference from CNN that would add valuable content to the article. CNN article on A-Space.
The section, Defense Intelligence Agency initial contribution, implies that the DIA Force Protection database will be in A-Space. The reference doesn't state this.
Alter Sackbut ( talk) 15:04, 23 November 2008 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 5 external links on A-Space. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 15:40, 23 June 2017 (UTC)
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
A-Space article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, defense, traveled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
My main concern(s) now is/are that the intro section is long enough to be a good stub articel on its own and rather overwhelming. The first paragraph of it would make a good intro and the rest of the information could be another section, or follow the ToC.
Secondly, some phrases sound a little "popular press"-ish (EG. "If all this sounds incredibly expensive", "That's why the site", etc.).
Having said that, I appreciate the tone of your message and the quality of the articel's contents. 68.39.174.238 ( talk) 20:47, 27 April 2008 (UTC)
The section on tactical user needs does not appear to have anything to do with A-Space. I read the references, which do not describe A-Space.
There is also another more recent reference from CNN that would add valuable content to the article. CNN article on A-Space.
The section, Defense Intelligence Agency initial contribution, implies that the DIA Force Protection database will be in A-Space. The reference doesn't state this.
Alter Sackbut ( talk) 15:04, 23 November 2008 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 5 external links on A-Space. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 15:40, 23 June 2017 (UTC)