A, A Prime was nominated as a Language and literature good article, but it did not meet the good article criteria at the time (June 6, 2016). There are suggestions on the review page for improving the article. If you can improve it, please do; it may then be renominated. |
This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||
|
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Narutolovehinata5 ( talk · contribs) 22:06, 13 June 2016 (UTC)
Not reviewing this article just yet; I'll give the contributors time to expand the article, but the article feels a bit short. I'm not sure if it's because the article isn't finished yet, or because that's all the sources say. At the very least, the article is right now a C-class and possibly even a B-class, but I'm not sure if it can pass the GA criteria just yet.
Also, just a comment, but is there any available information on the anthology's production? And, while not required, more Japanese sources (particularly Japanese reviews/views/other sources) are very much appreciated. Narutolovehinata5 t c csd new 22:06, 13 June 2016 (UTC)
Just to weigh in here, the article does not resemble the other GA examples and one of the big areas that it is lacking in is content. Like Gabriel Yuji said, it's possible that there aren't any more reliable sources available in English, but there really isn't a point where an article becomes "finished" and gets classed up. As someone who's done a quite a bit of assessment with WP:ANIME in the past, I would say this probably has achieved B-Class but is not sufficiently fleshed out to be considered GA. -- Kraftlos ( Talk | Contrib) 10:24, 20 June 2016 (UTC)
A, A Prime was nominated as a Language and literature good article, but it did not meet the good article criteria at the time (June 6, 2016). There are suggestions on the review page for improving the article. If you can improve it, please do; it may then be renominated. |
This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||
|
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Narutolovehinata5 ( talk · contribs) 22:06, 13 June 2016 (UTC)
Not reviewing this article just yet; I'll give the contributors time to expand the article, but the article feels a bit short. I'm not sure if it's because the article isn't finished yet, or because that's all the sources say. At the very least, the article is right now a C-class and possibly even a B-class, but I'm not sure if it can pass the GA criteria just yet.
Also, just a comment, but is there any available information on the anthology's production? And, while not required, more Japanese sources (particularly Japanese reviews/views/other sources) are very much appreciated. Narutolovehinata5 t c csd new 22:06, 13 June 2016 (UTC)
Just to weigh in here, the article does not resemble the other GA examples and one of the big areas that it is lacking in is content. Like Gabriel Yuji said, it's possible that there aren't any more reliable sources available in English, but there really isn't a point where an article becomes "finished" and gets classed up. As someone who's done a quite a bit of assessment with WP:ANIME in the past, I would say this probably has achieved B-Class but is not sufficiently fleshed out to be considered GA. -- Kraftlos ( Talk | Contrib) 10:24, 20 June 2016 (UTC)