This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
It would be a useful addition to state what the initials A and E actually stand for. Andrew Oakley 14:00, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
Not sure if anyone ever answered your question, but A & E stands for Arts and Entertainment. Although the A&E network is anything BUT that now. — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
69.115.229.79 (
talk) 14:51, 17 November 2011 (UTC)
How does this work:
If Disney-ABC and Hearst both had 43% and NBCUniversal had 16% then who has the remaining 41%? If Disney-ABC and Hearst each had 43% and NBCUniversal had 16% then that's 102%. Beck13 ( talk) 09:13, 13 November 2013 (UTC)
Wikimandia, A+E Networks is not its actual name. [ A&E Television Networks, LLC is its actual name and "A&E Television Networks", or "A&E Networks", (short) is its common name (which the wlinke will tell you articles should be titled) as "+" is a stylization for "&" which used to be a letter of the alphabets. The plus is to differentiate the company from the channel, I do believe.-- Spshu ( talk) 13:38, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
The result of the move request was: not moved. ( closed by non-admin page mover) — Guan aco 09:48, 19 June 2017 (UTC)
A&E Networks → A+E Networks – As there has been a plus sign in the logo for the last 6 years (including the new one), it is my assumption that the plus sign is used as an ampersand. Therefore, "A+E Networks" should be the name of this article. 2601:8C:4001:DCB9:590A:22F5:CBB:4688 ( talk) 02:11, 12 June 2017 (UTC)
I think Blaze should be given back its separate article. If more sources are cited in the article, then there would be no reason to merge it into this article. The channel can have its own article standing alone without being part of its owner's article. 2601:8C:4001:DCB9:5C90:D6E7:9239:B393 ( talk) 23:35, 12 June 2017 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on A&E Networks. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 15:15, 23 June 2017 (UTC)
I propose that sections Blaze be split into a separate page called Blaze (A+E Channel).
Crazyseiko and Spshu I support a content fork - it's a standalone channel that has been reported in the media - but, it's misnamed. It would be more descriptive and accurate as Blaze (A+E Channel), since it's apparently also in Spain. [ [3]]. TimTempleton (talk) (cont) 23:54, 19 December 2019 (UTC)
Following are on the Blaze section
other piece from web search
This company made Music for the branding: https://www.zeligsound.com/blaze this company made the presentation for the channel https://twitter.com/DixonBaxi/status/823447704827203584?s=20
its NOT noticable yet channels that are NOT freeview like this have pages??
None of these pages should have there own page then and should be merged back into the VERY LONG main article These all have fewer refs are tucked away on Premium channel platforms yet are somehow more WP:NOTABILITY Lifetime was only in the UK!
Notability may be presumed for a radio and television broadcast station if it verifiably meets through reliable sources, one or more of a variety of factors, such as importance to and history in the station's market, or originating some of its own programming. A brief explanation of the broadcast market may be needed in the guideline for editors to make informed decisions.
* Television stations – The vast majority of over-the-air television stations serve a large regional market, often covering millions of households. The regulatory authorities, such as the FCC in the United States, grant each station a monopoly on a substantial portion of radio spectrum to carry their programming, and most metro areas only have a dozen or so television channels. In turn, the TV stations must devote certain hours to public affairs and educational programming, and grant equal time to political candidates. Because of the public interest served, most television stations that produce original content should be presumed notable for Wikipedia purposes.
* Cable television – Generally, national or regional cable channels are presumed notable. Public access cable stations are not presumed notable unless they serve a major city or a large regional area. For example, a statewide public access channel, or a channel for all of New York City could be presumed notable. A "governmental access" feed that runs a text generator of community events plus city council meetings for a population of 50,000 is not generally presumed notable, but can be conferred notability by meeting the standards set forth in WP:CORP.
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
It would be a useful addition to state what the initials A and E actually stand for. Andrew Oakley 14:00, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
Not sure if anyone ever answered your question, but A & E stands for Arts and Entertainment. Although the A&E network is anything BUT that now. — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
69.115.229.79 (
talk) 14:51, 17 November 2011 (UTC)
How does this work:
If Disney-ABC and Hearst both had 43% and NBCUniversal had 16% then who has the remaining 41%? If Disney-ABC and Hearst each had 43% and NBCUniversal had 16% then that's 102%. Beck13 ( talk) 09:13, 13 November 2013 (UTC)
Wikimandia, A+E Networks is not its actual name. [ A&E Television Networks, LLC is its actual name and "A&E Television Networks", or "A&E Networks", (short) is its common name (which the wlinke will tell you articles should be titled) as "+" is a stylization for "&" which used to be a letter of the alphabets. The plus is to differentiate the company from the channel, I do believe.-- Spshu ( talk) 13:38, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
The result of the move request was: not moved. ( closed by non-admin page mover) — Guan aco 09:48, 19 June 2017 (UTC)
A&E Networks → A+E Networks – As there has been a plus sign in the logo for the last 6 years (including the new one), it is my assumption that the plus sign is used as an ampersand. Therefore, "A+E Networks" should be the name of this article. 2601:8C:4001:DCB9:590A:22F5:CBB:4688 ( talk) 02:11, 12 June 2017 (UTC)
I think Blaze should be given back its separate article. If more sources are cited in the article, then there would be no reason to merge it into this article. The channel can have its own article standing alone without being part of its owner's article. 2601:8C:4001:DCB9:5C90:D6E7:9239:B393 ( talk) 23:35, 12 June 2017 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on A&E Networks. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 15:15, 23 June 2017 (UTC)
I propose that sections Blaze be split into a separate page called Blaze (A+E Channel).
Crazyseiko and Spshu I support a content fork - it's a standalone channel that has been reported in the media - but, it's misnamed. It would be more descriptive and accurate as Blaze (A+E Channel), since it's apparently also in Spain. [ [3]]. TimTempleton (talk) (cont) 23:54, 19 December 2019 (UTC)
Following are on the Blaze section
other piece from web search
This company made Music for the branding: https://www.zeligsound.com/blaze this company made the presentation for the channel https://twitter.com/DixonBaxi/status/823447704827203584?s=20
its NOT noticable yet channels that are NOT freeview like this have pages??
None of these pages should have there own page then and should be merged back into the VERY LONG main article These all have fewer refs are tucked away on Premium channel platforms yet are somehow more WP:NOTABILITY Lifetime was only in the UK!
Notability may be presumed for a radio and television broadcast station if it verifiably meets through reliable sources, one or more of a variety of factors, such as importance to and history in the station's market, or originating some of its own programming. A brief explanation of the broadcast market may be needed in the guideline for editors to make informed decisions.
* Television stations – The vast majority of over-the-air television stations serve a large regional market, often covering millions of households. The regulatory authorities, such as the FCC in the United States, grant each station a monopoly on a substantial portion of radio spectrum to carry their programming, and most metro areas only have a dozen or so television channels. In turn, the TV stations must devote certain hours to public affairs and educational programming, and grant equal time to political candidates. Because of the public interest served, most television stations that produce original content should be presumed notable for Wikipedia purposes.
* Cable television – Generally, national or regional cable channels are presumed notable. Public access cable stations are not presumed notable unless they serve a major city or a large regional area. For example, a statewide public access channel, or a channel for all of New York City could be presumed notable. A "governmental access" feed that runs a text generator of community events plus city council meetings for a population of 50,000 is not generally presumed notable, but can be conferred notability by meeting the standards set forth in WP:CORP.