This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Years Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Years, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Years on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.YearsWikipedia:WikiProject YearsTemplate:WikiProject YearsYears articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Middle Ages Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Middle Ages, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Middle Ages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Middle AgesWikipedia:WikiProject Middle AgesTemplate:WikiProject Middle AgesMiddle Ages articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Lists Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

How can it be correct that year 621 is year 666 in the Julian calendar? The discrepancy between the Gregorian and the Julian is merely 13 days, nowadays, both pertaining to the calculations of Denis le Petit in A.D. 525. But, I'm aware of that the Julian Calendar has quite a complex history and that Denis is not the only one attempting to find the correct date of Anno Deus. This needs to be substantiated. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Xact ( talk • contribs) 18:27, 14 December 2009 (UTC) reply

Do numbers always relate to years?

I need somewhere to add flavour enhancer 621.

-- William Wang 06:37, 17 March 2006 (UTC) reply