This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Ideal sources for Wikipedia's health content are defined in the guideline
Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources (medicine) and are typically
review articles. Here are links to possibly useful sources of information about 4-Hydroxy-5-methoxydimethyltryptamine.
|
The following Wikipedia contributor may be personally or professionally connected to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include
conflict of interest,
autobiography, and
neutral point of view.
|
Nice job whoever cleaned up this page 71.52.51.151 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.52.51.151 ( talk • contribs) 05:47, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
The article states "it has been used successfully for changing DPT and DIPT into 4-HO-DPT and 4-HO-DIPT" but it cites no sources for this claim. It is important because this DPT/DiPT biotransformation concept continues throughout the article. On the other hand DET conversion into 4-HO-DET and 4-PO-DMT has been produced according to Gartz J. successfully via the same route of adding synthetic drug (DET in this case) to " Mycelial cultures of Psilocybe cubensis". If a source is not added to the claim(s) I will replace them with the DET--->4-HO-DMT/4-PO-DMT biotransformation along with the Gartz reference.-- Astavats ( talk) 08:37, 23 January 2008 (UTC)
The Pasteur Institute citation is wrong. This compound is not discussed in that article. 129.137.151.184 ( talk) 15:37, 12 March 2009 (UTC)
This statement lends a credibility to the article, and so should be cited: "However, Alexander Shulgin has explained that it could be possible to cultivate 4-HO-5-MeO-DMT in psilocybin mushrooms by adding 5-MeO-DMT to the growing substrate of the fungus". This has been echoed on social media but I have yet to see an actual source of this information. Pineapplepiranha ( talk) 04:34, 8 March 2023 (UTC)
Because members of the cult keep vandalizing this Wikipedia with incorrect information I'm posting a copy of this here.
On April 12th, 2023 a study was published that analyzed the claimed sacred sacrament mushroom material that is sold by The Church of Psilomethoxin and did not contain any Psilomethoxin or any 5-Meo-DMT and appears to be typical Psilocybin mushroom material containing psilocybin and psilocin, with a trace amount of baeocystin. [1] In a response to this study, The Church of Psilomethoxin published a response saying "the Church has never, at any time, laid claim to the fact that Psilomethoxin has ever been positively identified in its sacrament." and "The individuals attacking and attempting to discredit our Church, seemingly operate off the erroneous assumption that the Church has made the claim that Psilomethoxin has been positively identified in its Sacrament" and "Our claims to the existence of Psilomethoxin, at this time, are solely based on faith". [2]
Gettinglit ( talk) 13:37, 26 April 2023 (UTC)
References
Seems like the church has continued its vandalism, not only by inserting its own beliefs and perceptions, but also by (presumably) incompetence and/or simply not knowing how Wikipedia articles are supposed to be written and formatted. The quality of this article as it stands now is very low – dare I say unacceptably so. Someone with higher privileges than me might want to request temporary editing protection for this article. Adrianpip2000 ( talk) 20:02, 19 May 2023 (UTC)
Why was all the clearly sourced and verifiable data, such even the IUPAC name, a literal systematic title based on structure- removed? Its was referenced properly through chemical databases as well as other identifiers. It seems that care was not taken when deciding nothing was good enough after, perhaps hastily, or perhaps sincerely finding something worth removing. I can accept an edit may have not fully risen to the standards- but taking away even the literature published melting point cited properly and even the actual IUPAC name was a bit extreme, although comical. ChurchofSacredSynthesis ( talk) 00:34, 11 June 2023 (UTC)
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Ideal sources for Wikipedia's health content are defined in the guideline
Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources (medicine) and are typically
review articles. Here are links to possibly useful sources of information about 4-Hydroxy-5-methoxydimethyltryptamine.
|
The following Wikipedia contributor may be personally or professionally connected to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include
conflict of interest,
autobiography, and
neutral point of view.
|
Nice job whoever cleaned up this page 71.52.51.151 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.52.51.151 ( talk • contribs) 05:47, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
The article states "it has been used successfully for changing DPT and DIPT into 4-HO-DPT and 4-HO-DIPT" but it cites no sources for this claim. It is important because this DPT/DiPT biotransformation concept continues throughout the article. On the other hand DET conversion into 4-HO-DET and 4-PO-DMT has been produced according to Gartz J. successfully via the same route of adding synthetic drug (DET in this case) to " Mycelial cultures of Psilocybe cubensis". If a source is not added to the claim(s) I will replace them with the DET--->4-HO-DMT/4-PO-DMT biotransformation along with the Gartz reference.-- Astavats ( talk) 08:37, 23 January 2008 (UTC)
The Pasteur Institute citation is wrong. This compound is not discussed in that article. 129.137.151.184 ( talk) 15:37, 12 March 2009 (UTC)
This statement lends a credibility to the article, and so should be cited: "However, Alexander Shulgin has explained that it could be possible to cultivate 4-HO-5-MeO-DMT in psilocybin mushrooms by adding 5-MeO-DMT to the growing substrate of the fungus". This has been echoed on social media but I have yet to see an actual source of this information. Pineapplepiranha ( talk) 04:34, 8 March 2023 (UTC)
Because members of the cult keep vandalizing this Wikipedia with incorrect information I'm posting a copy of this here.
On April 12th, 2023 a study was published that analyzed the claimed sacred sacrament mushroom material that is sold by The Church of Psilomethoxin and did not contain any Psilomethoxin or any 5-Meo-DMT and appears to be typical Psilocybin mushroom material containing psilocybin and psilocin, with a trace amount of baeocystin. [1] In a response to this study, The Church of Psilomethoxin published a response saying "the Church has never, at any time, laid claim to the fact that Psilomethoxin has ever been positively identified in its sacrament." and "The individuals attacking and attempting to discredit our Church, seemingly operate off the erroneous assumption that the Church has made the claim that Psilomethoxin has been positively identified in its Sacrament" and "Our claims to the existence of Psilomethoxin, at this time, are solely based on faith". [2]
Gettinglit ( talk) 13:37, 26 April 2023 (UTC)
References
Seems like the church has continued its vandalism, not only by inserting its own beliefs and perceptions, but also by (presumably) incompetence and/or simply not knowing how Wikipedia articles are supposed to be written and formatted. The quality of this article as it stands now is very low – dare I say unacceptably so. Someone with higher privileges than me might want to request temporary editing protection for this article. Adrianpip2000 ( talk) 20:02, 19 May 2023 (UTC)
Why was all the clearly sourced and verifiable data, such even the IUPAC name, a literal systematic title based on structure- removed? Its was referenced properly through chemical databases as well as other identifiers. It seems that care was not taken when deciding nothing was good enough after, perhaps hastily, or perhaps sincerely finding something worth removing. I can accept an edit may have not fully risen to the standards- but taking away even the literature published melting point cited properly and even the actual IUPAC name was a bit extreme, although comical. ChurchofSacredSynthesis ( talk) 00:34, 11 June 2023 (UTC)