This
level-5 vital article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
I do not understand this article needs more citations: There are 3 links to the original science publications over "2MASS" on the internet, the title article is an own citation of an scientific project, in the article there is a table with citations over the organizations who made the scientific project and the data sources. Is anywhere an article on Wikipedia with more citations than that article? Vibria ( talk) 16:41, 20 September 2008 (UTC)
I'd like to expand this article, so as a placeholder for myself (and other interested editors), I'm putting links/citations for refs to use here. AstroCog ( talk) 12:28, 26 October 2011 (UTC)
There is a discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Astronomical objects#WISE object notability and Talk:WISEPC J150649.97+702736.0#Notability that has implications for 2MASS objects.
Specifically, the question being asked is whether a slightly more liberal notability test is appropriate for the closest objects to Sol, such as the nearest brown dwarfs discovered by WISE.
Comments welcome either here or on either of those two pages. The discussion on the WISE page should of course focus on WISE objects, that here on 2MASS objects, and that on the WikiProject talk page on astronomical objects generally. But there's some interconnection, equally obviously. Andrewa ( talk) 07:03, 18 December 2012 (UTC)
At the moment 2MASS survey is referred in numerous scientific papers. Where to find additional citations for impact this survey had on astronomy? -- Artman40 ( talk) 10:52, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
This table is not a useful addition to the article, for several reasons.
No good reason has been given for its inclusion by the editor who is trying to force it in. The article is short so leave it in? Not a good reason. People have asked specifically for this information? Who? When? I suggested making a new article for this, which would be a perfectly good solution if you feel this information is valuable. Why did you reject that option? 201.215.187.159 ( talk) 14:16, 29 June 2013 (UTC)
Object | Type | ly |
Spectral type |
Constellation |
Right ascension |
Declination |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2MASS 0036+1821 | brown dwarf | 29 | L3.5 | Pisces | 00h 36m 16.17s | 18° 21′ 10.4″ |
2MASS 0348-6022 [1] | brown dwarf | 25 | T7 | Reticulum | 03h 48m 07.72s | −60° 22′ 27″ |
2MASS 0415-0935 | brown dwarf | 18 | T8V | Eridanus | 04h 15m 19.54s | −09° 35′ 06.6″ |
2MASS 0727+1710 | brown dwarf | 28 | T7 | Gemini | 07h 27m 18.24s | 17° 10′ 01.2″ |
2MASS 0729-3954 [1] | brown dwarf | 23 | T8p | Puppis | 07h 29m 00.02s | −39° 54′ 04.3″ |
2MASS 0937+2931 | brown dwarf | 20 | T6 | Leo | 09h 37m 34.9s | 29° 31′ 41″ |
2MASS 0939-2448 | brown dwarf | 17 | T8 | Antlia | 09h 39m 35.48s | −24° 48′ 27.9″ |
2MASS 1114-2618 | brown dwarf | 18 | T7.5 | Hydra | 11h 14m 51.337s | −26° 18′ 23.56″ |
2MASS 1503+2525 [2] | brown dwarf | 23 | T5 | Bootes | 15h 03m 19.61s | 25° 25′ 19.6″ |
2MASS 1507-1627 | brown dwarf | 24 | L5 | Libra | 15h 07m 47.69s | −16° 27′ 38.6″ |
2MASS 1835+3259 | brown dwarf | 18 | M8.5 | Lyra | 18h 35m 37.902s | 32° 59′ 54.59″ |
Gliese 293 | white dwarf | 26 | DC8.8 | Volans | 07h 53m 08.15s | −67° 47′ 31.4″ |
Gliese 440 | white dwarf | 15 | DQ6 | Musca | 11h 45m 42.9205s | −64° 50′ 29.459″ |
Gliese 518 | white dwarf | 27 | DZ10.0 | Virgo | 13h 36m 31.81s | 03° 40′ 45″ |
Gliese 915 | white dwarf | 27 | DAP5.8 | Phoenix | 00h 02m 10.766s | −43° 09′ 56.02″ |
GJ 1087 | white dwarf | 26 | DAP8.9 | Orion | 05h 56m 25.47s | 05° 21′ 48.6″ |
GJ 1221 | white dwarf | 20 | DQP9.0 | Draco | 17h 48m 08.17s | 70° 52′ 35.3″ |
GJ 1289 | red dwarf | 26 | M4.0V | Andromeda | 23h 43m 06.289s | 36° 32′ 13.24″ |
Van Maanen's star | white dwarf | 14 | DZ8 | Pisces | 00h 49m 09.90175s | 05° 23′ 19.0117″ |
This
level-5 vital article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
I do not understand this article needs more citations: There are 3 links to the original science publications over "2MASS" on the internet, the title article is an own citation of an scientific project, in the article there is a table with citations over the organizations who made the scientific project and the data sources. Is anywhere an article on Wikipedia with more citations than that article? Vibria ( talk) 16:41, 20 September 2008 (UTC)
I'd like to expand this article, so as a placeholder for myself (and other interested editors), I'm putting links/citations for refs to use here. AstroCog ( talk) 12:28, 26 October 2011 (UTC)
There is a discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Astronomical objects#WISE object notability and Talk:WISEPC J150649.97+702736.0#Notability that has implications for 2MASS objects.
Specifically, the question being asked is whether a slightly more liberal notability test is appropriate for the closest objects to Sol, such as the nearest brown dwarfs discovered by WISE.
Comments welcome either here or on either of those two pages. The discussion on the WISE page should of course focus on WISE objects, that here on 2MASS objects, and that on the WikiProject talk page on astronomical objects generally. But there's some interconnection, equally obviously. Andrewa ( talk) 07:03, 18 December 2012 (UTC)
At the moment 2MASS survey is referred in numerous scientific papers. Where to find additional citations for impact this survey had on astronomy? -- Artman40 ( talk) 10:52, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
This table is not a useful addition to the article, for several reasons.
No good reason has been given for its inclusion by the editor who is trying to force it in. The article is short so leave it in? Not a good reason. People have asked specifically for this information? Who? When? I suggested making a new article for this, which would be a perfectly good solution if you feel this information is valuable. Why did you reject that option? 201.215.187.159 ( talk) 14:16, 29 June 2013 (UTC)
Object | Type | ly |
Spectral type |
Constellation |
Right ascension |
Declination |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2MASS 0036+1821 | brown dwarf | 29 | L3.5 | Pisces | 00h 36m 16.17s | 18° 21′ 10.4″ |
2MASS 0348-6022 [1] | brown dwarf | 25 | T7 | Reticulum | 03h 48m 07.72s | −60° 22′ 27″ |
2MASS 0415-0935 | brown dwarf | 18 | T8V | Eridanus | 04h 15m 19.54s | −09° 35′ 06.6″ |
2MASS 0727+1710 | brown dwarf | 28 | T7 | Gemini | 07h 27m 18.24s | 17° 10′ 01.2″ |
2MASS 0729-3954 [1] | brown dwarf | 23 | T8p | Puppis | 07h 29m 00.02s | −39° 54′ 04.3″ |
2MASS 0937+2931 | brown dwarf | 20 | T6 | Leo | 09h 37m 34.9s | 29° 31′ 41″ |
2MASS 0939-2448 | brown dwarf | 17 | T8 | Antlia | 09h 39m 35.48s | −24° 48′ 27.9″ |
2MASS 1114-2618 | brown dwarf | 18 | T7.5 | Hydra | 11h 14m 51.337s | −26° 18′ 23.56″ |
2MASS 1503+2525 [2] | brown dwarf | 23 | T5 | Bootes | 15h 03m 19.61s | 25° 25′ 19.6″ |
2MASS 1507-1627 | brown dwarf | 24 | L5 | Libra | 15h 07m 47.69s | −16° 27′ 38.6″ |
2MASS 1835+3259 | brown dwarf | 18 | M8.5 | Lyra | 18h 35m 37.902s | 32° 59′ 54.59″ |
Gliese 293 | white dwarf | 26 | DC8.8 | Volans | 07h 53m 08.15s | −67° 47′ 31.4″ |
Gliese 440 | white dwarf | 15 | DQ6 | Musca | 11h 45m 42.9205s | −64° 50′ 29.459″ |
Gliese 518 | white dwarf | 27 | DZ10.0 | Virgo | 13h 36m 31.81s | 03° 40′ 45″ |
Gliese 915 | white dwarf | 27 | DAP5.8 | Phoenix | 00h 02m 10.766s | −43° 09′ 56.02″ |
GJ 1087 | white dwarf | 26 | DAP8.9 | Orion | 05h 56m 25.47s | 05° 21′ 48.6″ |
GJ 1221 | white dwarf | 20 | DQP9.0 | Draco | 17h 48m 08.17s | 70° 52′ 35.3″ |
GJ 1289 | red dwarf | 26 | M4.0V | Andromeda | 23h 43m 06.289s | 36° 32′ 13.24″ |
Van Maanen's star | white dwarf | 14 | DZ8 | Pisces | 00h 49m 09.90175s | 05° 23′ 19.0117″ |