28th (Thames and Medway) Anti-Aircraft Brigade was nominated as a Warfare good article, but it did not meet the good article criteria at the time (December 5, 2018). There are suggestions on the review page for improving the article. If you can improve it, please do; it may then be renominated. |
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
28th (Thames and Medway) Anti-Aircraft Brigade article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on 28th (Thames and Medway) Anti-Aircraft Brigade. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 15:25, 29 September 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 4 external links on 28th (Thames and Medway) Anti-Aircraft Brigade. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 12:11, 22 June 2017 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Kges1901 ( talk · contribs) 12:29, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
Rereading in the light of your comments it has quite a way to go. A key on line source also seems to have disappeared. I am a little surprised, now, that you didn't give it a quick fail. (I have been toying with this for over 6 months, thinking that there was a GA in it. I suspect that I managed to fool myself.) I will work through your comments, and various other things I now see as I look at the article more critically. If you wish to give it a fail while I work on it I will understand. Regardless, I appreciate the detailed assessment comments.Gog the Mild ( talk) 13:05, 25 September 2018 (UTC)
Referencing
Prose
Are you suggesting the removal of the whole section on technical improvements, or just the bit referring to the Operational Research Group being based at one of the 28th's sites?
Kges1901 ( talk) 13:13, 22 September 2018 (UTC) Kges1901 ( talk) 21:04, 25 September 2018 (UTC)
28th (Thames and Medway) Anti-Aircraft Brigade was nominated as a Warfare good article, but it did not meet the good article criteria at the time (December 5, 2018). There are suggestions on the review page for improving the article. If you can improve it, please do; it may then be renominated. |
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
28th (Thames and Medway) Anti-Aircraft Brigade article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on 28th (Thames and Medway) Anti-Aircraft Brigade. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 15:25, 29 September 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 4 external links on 28th (Thames and Medway) Anti-Aircraft Brigade. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 12:11, 22 June 2017 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Kges1901 ( talk · contribs) 12:29, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
Rereading in the light of your comments it has quite a way to go. A key on line source also seems to have disappeared. I am a little surprised, now, that you didn't give it a quick fail. (I have been toying with this for over 6 months, thinking that there was a GA in it. I suspect that I managed to fool myself.) I will work through your comments, and various other things I now see as I look at the article more critically. If you wish to give it a fail while I work on it I will understand. Regardless, I appreciate the detailed assessment comments.Gog the Mild ( talk) 13:05, 25 September 2018 (UTC)
Referencing
Prose
Are you suggesting the removal of the whole section on technical improvements, or just the bit referring to the Operational Research Group being based at one of the 28th's sites?
Kges1901 ( talk) 13:13, 22 September 2018 (UTC) Kges1901 ( talk) 21:04, 25 September 2018 (UTC)