This article was nominated for deletion on 26 June 2015. The result of the discussion was keep. |
WARNING: ACTIVE COMMUNITY SANCTIONS The article 26 June 2015 Islamist attacks, along with other pages relating to the Syrian Civil War and ISIL, is designated by the community as a contentious topic. The current restrictions are:
Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be sanctioned.
|
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article should not be speedy deleted as being recently created, having no relevant page history and duplicating an existing English Wikipedia topic, because it contains information on why several terrorist attacks have occured today and the reason behind it. -- Alvaro B. ( talk) 13:55, 26 June 2015 (UTC)
I believe it should be kept for now, until we determine that the attacks were coordinated by a single entity and interconnected.-- Catlemur ( talk) 14:04, 26 June 2015 (UTC)
This article should not be speedy deleted because many news outlets are all linking these attacks as one coordinated terrorist event, which is looking likely so there is no need to speedily delete. -- Tomh903 ( talk) 13:59, 26 June 2015 (UTC)
This article should not be speedy because of the reasons explained by Tomh903.
Barjimoa ( talk) 14:03, 26 June 2015 (UTC)
This article should not be speedy deleted as being recently created, having no relevant page history and duplicating an existing English Wikipedia topic, because it acts as a "hub" of sorts like with the 2015 Île-de-France attacks with multiple important and relevant events that make up this article as with the multiple articles making up the Île-de-France attacks article. -- YingBlanc ( talk) 14:04, 26 June 2015 (UTC)
Do you have any clue what Ramadan is? That has nothing to do with the January incidents and there are many attacks that happened and will happen during 2015 Ramadan...as there has been for the past decade or so.
At the same time, we already have a link of 2015 non-state attacks which is a "hub" too. 120.62.27.54 ( talk) 14:23, 26 June 2015 (UTC)
We can change the name, maybe "June 26 Terrorist attacks". I mean, "2015 Ramadan attacks" can be perceived as a misleading name, that is true. However I oppose the idea to delete this article. Barjimoa ( talk) 14:35, 26 June 2015 (UTC)
Maybe June 26, 2015 attacks to consolidate it all. That seems fair. 120.62.27.54 ( talk) 16:04, 26 June 2015 (UTC)
The result of the proposal was no consensus. -- BDD ( talk) 17:01, 27 July 2015 (UTC)
2015 Ramadan attacks → Bloody Friday (2015) – Name given by western media [1] --Relisted. George Ho ( talk) 18:01, 25 July 2015 (UTC) --Relisted. — Amakuru ( talk) 14:44, 7 July 2015 (UTC) Jenda H. ( talk) 08:13, 27 June 2015 (UTC)
I say July 26, 2015 attacks would be an appropriate title. The notability is that three Islamist terrorist attacks occurred near simultaneously on this day and that has been noted WP:RS. They could be related, or it could all just be an incredible coincidence, the way things are going on in the world right now neither would surprise me. If Fatal, Bloody or Black Friday become well known terms for it, then it should be titled that.-- Bellerophon5685 ( talk) 03:32, 30 June 2015 (UTC)
We should include information on the IS attack on Kobane, one day prior to the attacks as it was still ongoing during 26 June and it was undertaken by ISIL, making a direct link to the Kuwait Bombings and Sousse Attacks. Prohibited Area ( talk) 11:33, 27 June 2015 (UTC)
I agree; IS is accused of massacring a significant amount of people on June 26th in Kobane. It should be added to the article. Leonnatus Chouan ( talk) 17:05, 27 June 2015 (UTC)
Please keep this article focused to the coverage of the attacks linked together by reliable sources. It is not a catch-all for attacks all over the world happening during this time, ie Boko Haram etc, until they are either proved to be motivated by ISIL or they (like the others) are all being discussed repeatedly in the reliable sources. Throwing everything together is synthesis and what nearly got this article deleted. —Мандичка YO 😜 16:04, 30 June 2015 (UTC)
Why delete an informative article in the first place? 168.187.250.57 ( talk) 10:11, 7 July 2015 (UTC)
I found English sources that only say "In June", however this Arabic source says it was planned on the same day as these attacks. Kuwaity26 ( talk) 21:08, 18 July 2015 (UTC)
Put something in about Leego. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lottolads ( talk • contribs) 16:28, 17 November 2015 (UTC)
Given that the last title move discussion ended with "no consensus" nearly a year ago, I assume it's perfectly okay to reopen this discussion. I personally would like 26 June 2015 attacks, with Bloody Friday coming in at second place. Other ideas and suggestions are welcome. Parsley Man ( talk) 07:59, 15 July 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on 26 June 2015 Islamist attacks. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 11:24, 22 June 2017 (UTC)
This article was nominated for deletion on 26 June 2015. The result of the discussion was keep. |
WARNING: ACTIVE COMMUNITY SANCTIONS The article 26 June 2015 Islamist attacks, along with other pages relating to the Syrian Civil War and ISIL, is designated by the community as a contentious topic. The current restrictions are:
Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be sanctioned.
|
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article should not be speedy deleted as being recently created, having no relevant page history and duplicating an existing English Wikipedia topic, because it contains information on why several terrorist attacks have occured today and the reason behind it. -- Alvaro B. ( talk) 13:55, 26 June 2015 (UTC)
I believe it should be kept for now, until we determine that the attacks were coordinated by a single entity and interconnected.-- Catlemur ( talk) 14:04, 26 June 2015 (UTC)
This article should not be speedy deleted because many news outlets are all linking these attacks as one coordinated terrorist event, which is looking likely so there is no need to speedily delete. -- Tomh903 ( talk) 13:59, 26 June 2015 (UTC)
This article should not be speedy because of the reasons explained by Tomh903.
Barjimoa ( talk) 14:03, 26 June 2015 (UTC)
This article should not be speedy deleted as being recently created, having no relevant page history and duplicating an existing English Wikipedia topic, because it acts as a "hub" of sorts like with the 2015 Île-de-France attacks with multiple important and relevant events that make up this article as with the multiple articles making up the Île-de-France attacks article. -- YingBlanc ( talk) 14:04, 26 June 2015 (UTC)
Do you have any clue what Ramadan is? That has nothing to do with the January incidents and there are many attacks that happened and will happen during 2015 Ramadan...as there has been for the past decade or so.
At the same time, we already have a link of 2015 non-state attacks which is a "hub" too. 120.62.27.54 ( talk) 14:23, 26 June 2015 (UTC)
We can change the name, maybe "June 26 Terrorist attacks". I mean, "2015 Ramadan attacks" can be perceived as a misleading name, that is true. However I oppose the idea to delete this article. Barjimoa ( talk) 14:35, 26 June 2015 (UTC)
Maybe June 26, 2015 attacks to consolidate it all. That seems fair. 120.62.27.54 ( talk) 16:04, 26 June 2015 (UTC)
The result of the proposal was no consensus. -- BDD ( talk) 17:01, 27 July 2015 (UTC)
2015 Ramadan attacks → Bloody Friday (2015) – Name given by western media [1] --Relisted. George Ho ( talk) 18:01, 25 July 2015 (UTC) --Relisted. — Amakuru ( talk) 14:44, 7 July 2015 (UTC) Jenda H. ( talk) 08:13, 27 June 2015 (UTC)
I say July 26, 2015 attacks would be an appropriate title. The notability is that three Islamist terrorist attacks occurred near simultaneously on this day and that has been noted WP:RS. They could be related, or it could all just be an incredible coincidence, the way things are going on in the world right now neither would surprise me. If Fatal, Bloody or Black Friday become well known terms for it, then it should be titled that.-- Bellerophon5685 ( talk) 03:32, 30 June 2015 (UTC)
We should include information on the IS attack on Kobane, one day prior to the attacks as it was still ongoing during 26 June and it was undertaken by ISIL, making a direct link to the Kuwait Bombings and Sousse Attacks. Prohibited Area ( talk) 11:33, 27 June 2015 (UTC)
I agree; IS is accused of massacring a significant amount of people on June 26th in Kobane. It should be added to the article. Leonnatus Chouan ( talk) 17:05, 27 June 2015 (UTC)
Please keep this article focused to the coverage of the attacks linked together by reliable sources. It is not a catch-all for attacks all over the world happening during this time, ie Boko Haram etc, until they are either proved to be motivated by ISIL or they (like the others) are all being discussed repeatedly in the reliable sources. Throwing everything together is synthesis and what nearly got this article deleted. —Мандичка YO 😜 16:04, 30 June 2015 (UTC)
Why delete an informative article in the first place? 168.187.250.57 ( talk) 10:11, 7 July 2015 (UTC)
I found English sources that only say "In June", however this Arabic source says it was planned on the same day as these attacks. Kuwaity26 ( talk) 21:08, 18 July 2015 (UTC)
Put something in about Leego. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lottolads ( talk • contribs) 16:28, 17 November 2015 (UTC)
Given that the last title move discussion ended with "no consensus" nearly a year ago, I assume it's perfectly okay to reopen this discussion. I personally would like 26 June 2015 attacks, with Bloody Friday coming in at second place. Other ideas and suggestions are welcome. Parsley Man ( talk) 07:59, 15 July 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on 26 June 2015 Islamist attacks. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 11:24, 22 June 2017 (UTC)