This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

United States: District of Columbia Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject District of Columbia. Military history: North America / United States C‑class This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles C This article has been rated as C-class on the project's quality scale. This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status: Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met Associated task forces: /  North American military history task force United States military history task force Guild of Copy Editors This article was copy edited by a member of the Guild of Copy Editors.Guild of Copy EditorsWikipedia:WikiProject Guild of Copy EditorsTemplate:WikiProject Guild of Copy EditorsGuild of Copy Editors articles

This article contains information that originally came from a US Government website, in the public domain. Aeh4543 07:30, 28 April 2007 (UTC) reply

The source site at least was not a US government site. Garion96 (talk) 08:45, 28 April 2007 (UTC) reply

Wrong. Here's the site I used: http://www.dcandr.ang.af.mil/units/231CBCS/. Aeh4543 08:24, 29 April 2007 (UTC) reply

Next time when someone puts a speedy tag on, please specify on the talk page from what site the text came from. Since the site mentioned in the speedy tag was not a public domain site. Garion96 (talk) 12:49, 29 April 2007 (UTC) reply

I am not sure if the MOS rule applies to such a short article, but the lead should be a summary to the article. The tools of communication are only mentioned once and that is in the lead. Surley they should be placed in their own heading?

I will go ahead and you can change or revert it if necessary. Glubbdrubb ( talk) 12:20, 4 January 2009 (UTC) reply

AikiHawkeye ( talk) 03:31, 12 February 2009 (UTC) reply