220th Military Police Brigade has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones Date Process Result August 21, 2008 Good article nominee Listed

This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Military history: North America / United States / Cold War This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles Associated task forces: /  North American military history task force United States military history task force Cold War task force (c. 1945 – c. 1989) United States: Military history Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject Military history - U.S. military history task force.

This review is transcluded from Talk:220th Military Police Brigade (United States)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Hi! I will be reviewing this article for GA, and should have the full review up within a few hours. Dana boomer ( talk) 15:36, 21 August 2008 (UTC) reply

GA review (see here for criteria)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b ( MoS):

   • Individual years should not be wikilinked.

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c ( OR):

   • If available, the author name should go first in the reference in the last name, first name format.
   • Current refs 3 and 6 need publisher info.

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

Overall, a well-written article. I am putting the article on hold to allow time to address the few minor concerns detailed above. If you have questions, you can ask them here on the review page or on my talk page. Dana boomer ( talk) 15:45, 21 August 2008 (UTC) reply

Fixed everything. How does it look now? - Ed! ^(talk) _{(Hall of Fame)} 17:02, 21 August 2008 (UTC) reply

Looks good, so I'm passing the article. For future work, I would suggest putting the author name first in the references, before the title, but this isn't something I'm going to hold the GA up over. Dana boomer ( talk) 17:45, 21 August 2008 (UTC) reply

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on 220th Military Police Brigade. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080622043405/http://www.tioh.hqda.pentagon.mil/MP/220th%20Military%20Police%20Brigade.htm to http://www.tioh.hqda.pentagon.mil/MP/220th%20Military%20Police%20Brigade.htm
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20091229053804/http://orbat.com/site/history/current_week_open/usarmy_reservepoliceunitsonduty_july92003.pdf to http://orbat.com/site/history/current_week_open/usarmy_reservepoliceunitsonduty_july92003.pdf
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070915125456/http://defendamerica.mil/awt/nov2001/awt110501a.html to http://www.defendamerica.mil/awt/nov2001/awt110501a.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{ source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 09:21, 22 June 2017 (UTC) reply