 | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Criticism
Criticism should be a separate section. If colonizing Poland was "motivation and goals", it must be proved that they killed Hitler because this would allow them to colonize Poland, and further it should be one of the main goals, shared by at least the majority of the member. Also it would be better if others could add their attitude towards other countries so we can have "attitude towards other countries" subsection, in the mean time we can keep it like that, but it would be misleading to the readers if we lead them to believe the Plot was somehow Poland-centric, or atrocities-centric (ie. they wanted Hitler killed because they wanted to commit even more atrocities!). See, if the US invaded to find WMD, than the goals were WMD. The crimes they commited in the processes or in other instances of war were not goals and motivations. If certain key people or organization wanted oil but covered it by the WMD story, than it should be mentioned that these people's goal was oil. Deamonpen ( talk) 01:36, 28 August 2016 (UTC)
- No one is saying that colonising Poland was a motivation for the plot. Using quotations from Stauffenberg from 1939 is pretty weak. The whole Criticism section is weak, and the focus on Poland doesn't make sense.-- Jack Upland ( talk) 08:11, 28 August 2016 (UTC)
| This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Criticism
Criticism should be a separate section. If colonizing Poland was "motivation and goals", it must be proved that they killed Hitler because this would allow them to colonize Poland, and further it should be one of the main goals, shared by at least the majority of the member. Also it would be better if others could add their attitude towards other countries so we can have "attitude towards other countries" subsection, in the mean time we can keep it like that, but it would be misleading to the readers if we lead them to believe the Plot was somehow Poland-centric, or atrocities-centric (ie. they wanted Hitler killed because they wanted to commit even more atrocities!). See, if the US invaded to find WMD, than the goals were WMD. The crimes they commited in the processes or in other instances of war were not goals and motivations. If certain key people or organization wanted oil but covered it by the WMD story, than it should be mentioned that these people's goal was oil. Deamonpen ( talk) 01:36, 28 August 2016 (UTC)
- No one is saying that colonising Poland was a motivation for the plot. Using quotations from Stauffenberg from 1939 is pretty weak. The whole Criticism section is weak, and the focus on Poland doesn't make sense.-- Jack Upland ( talk) 08:11, 28 August 2016 (UTC)