This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Elections and Referendums This article is within the scope of WikiProject Elections and Referendums, an ongoing effort to improve the quality of, expand upon and create new articles relating to elections, electoral reform and other aspects of democratic decision-making. For more information, visit our project page.Elections and ReferendumsWikipedia:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsTemplate:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsElections and Referendums articles Politics This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale. United States: New Hampshire C‑class Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles C This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible. Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject New Hampshire (assessed as High-importance).

Is there a reason Fiorina is "hot pink" other than being a woman? Therequiembellishere ( talk) 21:44, 10 February 2016 (UTC) reply

I added a paragraph to the voting irregularities section showing that several investigations by the state government of New Hampshire found no widespread evidence of fraud (specifically, the false allegations of people being bussed in from Massachusetts and elsewhere). Only 4 instances of fraud total were found - and they were due to honest mistakes, not a conspiracy to throw the state to Clinton and the Dems.

While I think that it is important to note that such baseless claims have been made by President Trump and that this should be kept in the article, I do wonder if this section seems to give too much merit to these allegations considering their groundlessness. For example, citing the fact that a state politician announced that 6,500 people used out of state licenses to vote - when this is actually, as the paragraph later notes, perfectly legal there - seems to implicitly endorse the suspicions of foul play. Part of me wonders if that part should just be deleted altogether, although I am open to further discussion on the matter. Either way, hopefully some clarity has been added now. Concchambers ( talk) 09:15, 3 December 2018 (UTC) reply