This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the 2016 Indian banknote demonetisation article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic. New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help. Assume good faith Be polite and avoid personal attacks Be welcoming to newcomers Seek dispute resolution if needed Article policies Neutral point of view No original research Verifiability

Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 30 days

The subject of this article is controversial and content may be in dispute. When updating the article, be bold, but not reckless. Feel free to try to improve the article, but don't take it personally if your changes are reversed; instead, come here to the talk page to discuss them. Content must be written from a neutral point of view. Include citations when adding content and consider tagging or removing unsourced information.

This article is written in Indian English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, analysed, defence) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

Specified Bank Notes (Cessation of Liabilities) Ordinance, 2016 was nominated for deletion. The discussion was closed on 8 January 2017 with a consensus to merge. Its contents were merged into 2016 Indian banknote demonetisation. The original page is now a redirect to this page. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected article, please see its history; for its talk page, see here.

A news item involving 2016 Indian banknote demonetisation was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the In the news section on 9 November 2016.

A fact from this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the On this day section on November 8, 2018 and November 8, 2021.

This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Asia This article is within the scope of WikiProject Asia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Asia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AsiaWikipedia:WikiProject AsiaTemplate:WikiProject AsiaAsia articles ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale. This article was created or improved during WikiProject Asia's " Asian 10,000 Challenge", which started in October 2016 and is still continuing. You can help! Economics Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Economics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Economics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EconomicsWikipedia:WikiProject EconomicsTemplate:WikiProject EconomicsEconomics articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Finance & Investment Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Finance & Investment, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Finance and Investment on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Finance & InvestmentWikipedia:WikiProject Finance & InvestmentTemplate:WikiProject Finance & InvestmentFinance & Investment articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. India Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Text and/or other creative content from this version of Narendra Modi’s demonetisation policy was copied or moved into Indian 500 and 1000 rupee note demonetisation with this edit on 13:53, 16 November 2016‎. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists.

Text and/or other creative content from Aakrosh Diwas was copied or moved into Indian 500 and 1000 rupee note demonetisation with this edit on 13 December 2016. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists.

Text and/or other creative content from this version of Live ATM Alert was copied or moved into Indian 500 and 1000 rupee note demonetisation with this edit on 30 November 2017. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists.

The contentious topics procedure applies to this page. This page is related to India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan, which has been designated as a contentious topic. Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page.

Why are you deleting the fact the Rupee notes have a promise and the Indian government has effectively stated they will not uphold the promise, hence India is not a country whose word can be relied upon? Are you denying the notes have a promise and the promise will not be honoured? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.107.240.15 ( talk) 23:11, 22 March 2022 (UTC) reply

It is being deleted because a reference to a reliable source is required to support your added text. The Discoverer ( talk) 05:43, 23 March 2022 (UTC) reply

This entire article is focused on criticisms of the demonetization. Excessive quotations from opponents, and the use of passive voice when talking about opposition to and criticism of the move, convey a strong sense of editorial bias inconsistent with the appropriate tone of a Wikipedia article. I am not knowledgeable about this topic, but given its importance, I do want to flag it for others who may be able to further improve the neutrality of the article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wobblygriswold ( talk • contribs) 03:58, 31 October 2022 (UTC) reply

And I've removed the tag, as you've only provided your say-so as evidence. You need to show that reliable sources discuss the demonetization in a manner that's more favorable than our article. Vanamonde ( Talk) 04:00, 31 October 2022 (UTC) reply