This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Would someone please set up the schedule for the 2016 Green Bay Packers because I don't know how to do it. The schedule just came out today. Ashbeckjonathan ( talk) 02:57, 15 April 2016 (UTC)
@ Kante4: You'll forgive me if I say I don't care that the format you reverted to is used by the Denver Broncos articles; the fact that a particular format is used by another article is irrelevant for the most part. The fact is, we have very little consistency between NFL team season articles, so the fact that one resembles another while there are several other styles out there is largely moot. I will, however, explain why I believe at least some of the changes I've implemented are worth keeping. Leaving aside – for the reasons I mentioned earlier – the fact that this format is used on the Minnesota Vikings season articles, the grammar is better for one thing. For example, there shouldn't be a comma before "(Mason Crosby kick)" since it is grammatically unnecessary. I've also removed the leading zeroes from times lower than 10:00. Times are not displayed with leading zeroes on game clocks, nor in the official NFL game books (see here). Obviously for times between 0:59 and 0:00, the leading zero has been left on, but they're not necessary for times between 9:59 and 1:00. I've also fixed capitalisations when it comes to "Yards", "Car" and "Rec". You may ask why I removed the Top Tacklers – I agree, defense is an important part of a team – but the reason is that they're not listed on the "Quick Take" section of the official NFL.com game recaps (see here). You may also ask why we don't list the two best rushers and receivers for each team, but that's not really practical here. Other changes are simply stylistic, adopted from the Vikings article, but if you're just objecting to those because the Denver article doesn't display info that way, then I would point you in the direction of the general NFL season articles, e.g. 2015–16 NFL playoffs, which display game stats in exactly the same way as the Vikings articles. I look forward to reading your reply. – Pee Jay 02:15, 22 September 2016 (UTC)
Is there any proof that Nantz and Simms will call Texans Packers? Ashbeckjonathan ( talk) 04:34, 25 November 2016 (UTC)
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Would someone please set up the schedule for the 2016 Green Bay Packers because I don't know how to do it. The schedule just came out today. Ashbeckjonathan ( talk) 02:57, 15 April 2016 (UTC)
@ Kante4: You'll forgive me if I say I don't care that the format you reverted to is used by the Denver Broncos articles; the fact that a particular format is used by another article is irrelevant for the most part. The fact is, we have very little consistency between NFL team season articles, so the fact that one resembles another while there are several other styles out there is largely moot. I will, however, explain why I believe at least some of the changes I've implemented are worth keeping. Leaving aside – for the reasons I mentioned earlier – the fact that this format is used on the Minnesota Vikings season articles, the grammar is better for one thing. For example, there shouldn't be a comma before "(Mason Crosby kick)" since it is grammatically unnecessary. I've also removed the leading zeroes from times lower than 10:00. Times are not displayed with leading zeroes on game clocks, nor in the official NFL game books (see here). Obviously for times between 0:59 and 0:00, the leading zero has been left on, but they're not necessary for times between 9:59 and 1:00. I've also fixed capitalisations when it comes to "Yards", "Car" and "Rec". You may ask why I removed the Top Tacklers – I agree, defense is an important part of a team – but the reason is that they're not listed on the "Quick Take" section of the official NFL.com game recaps (see here). You may also ask why we don't list the two best rushers and receivers for each team, but that's not really practical here. Other changes are simply stylistic, adopted from the Vikings article, but if you're just objecting to those because the Denver article doesn't display info that way, then I would point you in the direction of the general NFL season articles, e.g. 2015–16 NFL playoffs, which display game stats in exactly the same way as the Vikings articles. I look forward to reading your reply. – Pee Jay 02:15, 22 September 2016 (UTC)
Is there any proof that Nantz and Simms will call Texans Packers? Ashbeckjonathan ( talk) 04:34, 25 November 2016 (UTC)