A news item involving 2014–15 Premier League was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the In the news section on 6 May 2015. |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
First of all, sorry for edit warring. I just think that basic reasoning should fall under WP:CALC, as it has been done in previous years. I don't think it's too complex to see that it's impossible for Crystal Palace, West Brom and West Ham to all reach Manchester United, since West Ham will play both of the others. Just ask me to clarify if it's still nor clear. Cheers. 81.230.184.49 ( talk) 16:17, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
That seems like a reasonable reasoning for Southampton. => Spudgfsh ( Text Me!) 16:10, 1 April 2014 (UTC)
Newcastle can only be included when there is one of the following
neither has appeared yet. => Spudgfsh ( Text Me!) 19:23, 5 April 2014 (UTC)
Correct me if I'm wrong, but I believe that Swansea's loss today means that Stoke can be added. The reasoning: The only way Stoke can be relegated is if Sunderland make up the 18 point difference by winning all 6 of their remaining games. Their final game is against Swansea, who, in order to relegate Stoke, would need to make up the 10 point gap by getting at least a draw against Sunderland. These two outcomes are not simultaneously possible, so Stoke is safe. 99.250.32.162 ( talk) 23:56, 13 April 2014 (UTC)
someone needs to correct stoke on the table. Japhes5005 ( talk) 16:20, 11 May 2014 (UTC)
Is this article not a bit to early? Should we not wait until it actually has information different to last season (except Leicester)? Thanks, Mat ty. 007 08:19, 14 April 2014 (UTC)
Swansea are safe. They have 39 points.
Maximum points =
17th - Norwich City - 38 points max.
18th - Fulham - 37 points max.
19th - Cardiff City - 39 points max.
20th - Sunderland - 41 points max.
But because Cardiff and Sunderland still need to play each other (27 April) There is no way that they can both overtake Swansea. And then obviously neither can Norwich or Fulham.
ThisIsDanny (
talk) 00:30, 27 April 2014 (UTC)
This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
81.97.52.150 ( talk) 19:31, 4 May 2014 (UTC)
I've updated the kits/sponsors columns of the personnel and Kits section (where I can). Most of them now have references for the season in question but not all. I've also removed all of the ones whose deals expired this season or whose source didn't contain explicit reference to the deal applying to this season. If someone could check them for me I'd be grateful. => Spudgfsh ( Text Me!) 18:37, 12 May 2014 (UTC)
The League Table does not include 5th place gaining qualification into the Europa Cup. No longer are the FA cup runner ups given a place. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dinohunter999 ( talk • contribs) 17:45, 6 July 2014 (UTC)
The rules have changed though starting 2015-2016 in the European competitions. 5th place in the premier league is guaranteed a spot in the Europa Cup, irrespective of who wins the FA and League cup. 6th and 7th happen if cup winners have already got a qualification. So surely 5th should have a qualification on the League Table? The 2015-2015 Europa Cup page even has England 5th team as a Europa qualifier? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dinohunter999 ( talk • contribs) 23:22, 7 July 2014 (UTC)
This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Request for adjustment on the "Top scorers" table. The "rank" for Steven Naismith and Nathan Dyer should be 2 (instead of 3), as only Diego Costa has more goals than them. Thank you. 83.85.17.179 ( talk) 21:40, 30 August 2014 (UTC)
It seems a bit complicated for me to add myself, but someone needs to add tottenham vs liverpool in the "biggest away win" section. As both that and everton vs chelsea match have a win margin of 3 goals. 0danmaster0 ( talk) 21:23, 1 September 2014 (UTC)
Articles for other leagues include tables with players having most assists, however this article does not. I see that articles for previous seasons of Premier League do not have it as well. Does it need changing? In my mind, yes. How do others think? Skorpionas ( talk) 18:55, 4 November 2014 (UTC)
What font is the results table? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.18.70.10 ( talk) 20:46, 7 November 2014 (UTC)
Seriously someone help me
The table suggests that the Southampton kit is made by the club, but the source does not corroborate this. All the source states is that the deal with Adidas was being terminated and news would be coming in the next few months. That was May. Surely there is an updated source for this? 124.187.32.166 ( talk) 03:45, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
At the moment, only a handful statistics are there which is not fitting of one of the largest leagues in the world. I propose adding the statistic of highest assists for individual players, and following statistics for teams: 1) Top Scorers for individual teams, 2)Top Assist Makers for individual teams. I hope people can propose other statistics as well, which I believe is a very important part of sports. Learncontribute ( talk) 02:48, 23 December 2014 (UTC)
What I propose is that the section "Season statistics" be split into three sub-sections, namely "Player statistics", "Team Statistics" and "Tournament statistics", and the corresponding statistics be added in each section. Let me know what everyone else thinks. Learncontribute ( talk) 09:55, 23 December 2014 (UTC)
This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
manegrial changes Newcastle out alan parddew in no one 82.1.143.203 ( talk) 10:45, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Someone has taken away longest winning streak, longest losing streak, longest undefeated streak, and longest winless streak. 189.234.38.61 ( talk) 16:17, 31 December 2014 (UTC)
Question: And what do you want to be done? The content was removed due to lack of reliable source. The source used did not list all those stats and if several teams shared streak, they only showed one team. If there is a reliable source it can be re-added. QED237Â (talk) 17:34, 31 December 2014 (UTC)
Am I missing it, or is there no reference cited for the capacities of the various stadia? Seems the numbers have just been copied from last year? Bertcocaine ( talk) 16:04, 2 February 2015 (UTC)
Sugunda Division
Please changeit so it no longer says relegation to segunda division and replace with relegation to championship.
This is in the area of weekly positions.
Please change the segunda division to championship, this is in the area of weekly positions. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.177.123.101 ( talk) 22:56, 7 March 2015 (UTC)
Any chance we can have assists as well as goals? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.177.123.101 ( talk) 22:58, 7 March 2015 (UTC)
Would the Results table be more useful if it were to include the date a match took place as metadata (something that maybe live as the "title" attribute of a score element)?
Chrsmrrtt ( talk) 20:48, 22 March 2015 (UTC)
Why is there no key to what the columns are? What do W, D, and L mean? 96.51.16.28 ( talk) 21:41, 9 May 2015 (UTC)
[1] Europa League Extra Spot (for financial Fair Play). Will it be written Lzq2001 ( talk) 13:42, 11 May 2015 (UTC)
I've asked at Template talk:2014–15 Premier League table if this should be added to the league table. Joseph2302 ( talk) 13:49, 11 May 2015 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on 2014–15 Premier League. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 04:17, 27 September 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 12 external links on 2014–15 Premier League. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://fcbusiness.co.uk/news/article/newsitem%3D1635/title%3Daston%2Bvilla%2Bsecure%2Bnew%2B%A315%2Bmillion%2Bkit%2Bdeal%2Bwith%2BmacronWhen you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 04:30, 21 June 2017 (UTC)
A news item involving 2014–15 Premier League was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the In the news section on 6 May 2015. |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
First of all, sorry for edit warring. I just think that basic reasoning should fall under WP:CALC, as it has been done in previous years. I don't think it's too complex to see that it's impossible for Crystal Palace, West Brom and West Ham to all reach Manchester United, since West Ham will play both of the others. Just ask me to clarify if it's still nor clear. Cheers. 81.230.184.49 ( talk) 16:17, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
That seems like a reasonable reasoning for Southampton. => Spudgfsh ( Text Me!) 16:10, 1 April 2014 (UTC)
Newcastle can only be included when there is one of the following
neither has appeared yet. => Spudgfsh ( Text Me!) 19:23, 5 April 2014 (UTC)
Correct me if I'm wrong, but I believe that Swansea's loss today means that Stoke can be added. The reasoning: The only way Stoke can be relegated is if Sunderland make up the 18 point difference by winning all 6 of their remaining games. Their final game is against Swansea, who, in order to relegate Stoke, would need to make up the 10 point gap by getting at least a draw against Sunderland. These two outcomes are not simultaneously possible, so Stoke is safe. 99.250.32.162 ( talk) 23:56, 13 April 2014 (UTC)
someone needs to correct stoke on the table. Japhes5005 ( talk) 16:20, 11 May 2014 (UTC)
Is this article not a bit to early? Should we not wait until it actually has information different to last season (except Leicester)? Thanks, Mat ty. 007 08:19, 14 April 2014 (UTC)
Swansea are safe. They have 39 points.
Maximum points =
17th - Norwich City - 38 points max.
18th - Fulham - 37 points max.
19th - Cardiff City - 39 points max.
20th - Sunderland - 41 points max.
But because Cardiff and Sunderland still need to play each other (27 April) There is no way that they can both overtake Swansea. And then obviously neither can Norwich or Fulham.
ThisIsDanny (
talk) 00:30, 27 April 2014 (UTC)
This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
81.97.52.150 ( talk) 19:31, 4 May 2014 (UTC)
I've updated the kits/sponsors columns of the personnel and Kits section (where I can). Most of them now have references for the season in question but not all. I've also removed all of the ones whose deals expired this season or whose source didn't contain explicit reference to the deal applying to this season. If someone could check them for me I'd be grateful. => Spudgfsh ( Text Me!) 18:37, 12 May 2014 (UTC)
The League Table does not include 5th place gaining qualification into the Europa Cup. No longer are the FA cup runner ups given a place. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dinohunter999 ( talk • contribs) 17:45, 6 July 2014 (UTC)
The rules have changed though starting 2015-2016 in the European competitions. 5th place in the premier league is guaranteed a spot in the Europa Cup, irrespective of who wins the FA and League cup. 6th and 7th happen if cup winners have already got a qualification. So surely 5th should have a qualification on the League Table? The 2015-2015 Europa Cup page even has England 5th team as a Europa qualifier? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dinohunter999 ( talk • contribs) 23:22, 7 July 2014 (UTC)
This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Request for adjustment on the "Top scorers" table. The "rank" for Steven Naismith and Nathan Dyer should be 2 (instead of 3), as only Diego Costa has more goals than them. Thank you. 83.85.17.179 ( talk) 21:40, 30 August 2014 (UTC)
It seems a bit complicated for me to add myself, but someone needs to add tottenham vs liverpool in the "biggest away win" section. As both that and everton vs chelsea match have a win margin of 3 goals. 0danmaster0 ( talk) 21:23, 1 September 2014 (UTC)
Articles for other leagues include tables with players having most assists, however this article does not. I see that articles for previous seasons of Premier League do not have it as well. Does it need changing? In my mind, yes. How do others think? Skorpionas ( talk) 18:55, 4 November 2014 (UTC)
What font is the results table? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.18.70.10 ( talk) 20:46, 7 November 2014 (UTC)
Seriously someone help me
The table suggests that the Southampton kit is made by the club, but the source does not corroborate this. All the source states is that the deal with Adidas was being terminated and news would be coming in the next few months. That was May. Surely there is an updated source for this? 124.187.32.166 ( talk) 03:45, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
At the moment, only a handful statistics are there which is not fitting of one of the largest leagues in the world. I propose adding the statistic of highest assists for individual players, and following statistics for teams: 1) Top Scorers for individual teams, 2)Top Assist Makers for individual teams. I hope people can propose other statistics as well, which I believe is a very important part of sports. Learncontribute ( talk) 02:48, 23 December 2014 (UTC)
What I propose is that the section "Season statistics" be split into three sub-sections, namely "Player statistics", "Team Statistics" and "Tournament statistics", and the corresponding statistics be added in each section. Let me know what everyone else thinks. Learncontribute ( talk) 09:55, 23 December 2014 (UTC)
This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
manegrial changes Newcastle out alan parddew in no one 82.1.143.203 ( talk) 10:45, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Someone has taken away longest winning streak, longest losing streak, longest undefeated streak, and longest winless streak. 189.234.38.61 ( talk) 16:17, 31 December 2014 (UTC)
Question: And what do you want to be done? The content was removed due to lack of reliable source. The source used did not list all those stats and if several teams shared streak, they only showed one team. If there is a reliable source it can be re-added. QED237Â (talk) 17:34, 31 December 2014 (UTC)
Am I missing it, or is there no reference cited for the capacities of the various stadia? Seems the numbers have just been copied from last year? Bertcocaine ( talk) 16:04, 2 February 2015 (UTC)
Sugunda Division
Please changeit so it no longer says relegation to segunda division and replace with relegation to championship.
This is in the area of weekly positions.
Please change the segunda division to championship, this is in the area of weekly positions. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.177.123.101 ( talk) 22:56, 7 March 2015 (UTC)
Any chance we can have assists as well as goals? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.177.123.101 ( talk) 22:58, 7 March 2015 (UTC)
Would the Results table be more useful if it were to include the date a match took place as metadata (something that maybe live as the "title" attribute of a score element)?
Chrsmrrtt ( talk) 20:48, 22 March 2015 (UTC)
Why is there no key to what the columns are? What do W, D, and L mean? 96.51.16.28 ( talk) 21:41, 9 May 2015 (UTC)
[1] Europa League Extra Spot (for financial Fair Play). Will it be written Lzq2001 ( talk) 13:42, 11 May 2015 (UTC)
I've asked at Template talk:2014–15 Premier League table if this should be added to the league table. Joseph2302 ( talk) 13:49, 11 May 2015 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on 2014–15 Premier League. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 04:17, 27 September 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 12 external links on 2014–15 Premier League. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://fcbusiness.co.uk/news/article/newsitem%3D1635/title%3Daston%2Bvilla%2Bsecure%2Bnew%2B%A315%2Bmillion%2Bkit%2Bdeal%2Bwith%2BmacronWhen you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 04:30, 21 June 2017 (UTC)