This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
I wonder if the Peterborough friendly is actually worth listing? The article on ManUtd.com says that the game will be played by a "United XI", which is basically code for "the reserves", plus the first-team is playing in another friendly in Hanover the next day. I think the Peterborough game should be removed from the list. – Pee Jay 12:09, 4 July 2012 (UTC)
Not much point of it, is there? Gonna remove it. VEO one five 12:30, 22 July 2012 (UTC)
Would people want a list of the scheduled Premier League games, as well as the games already played? Some of the Spanish teams have this, e.g. 2012–13_Real_Madrid_C.F._season#Matches
I think this would be a nice addition, it makes for an easy way to look up future matches. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Motsjo ( talk • contribs) 07:37, 21 August 2012 (UTC)
I think Fabio and Amos can be removed from squad table. Yes it does show on manutd.com first team squad because there is no page showing 'Players on Loan'. And it shows on the website that Ben Amos will be playing 12-13 season for Hull City. The table will show 0 for all the columns for these players for this season. Whats your view guys?? Shreyas.shridhar ( talk) 09:30, 22 August 2012 (UTC)
As per Ole Solskjaer's inclusion in the 2007-08 squad stats section, Berbatov should be included in this season's squad stats section. Although he did not make any competitive appearances this season, he was part of the squad when the season started and should be mentioned. – Pee Jay 10:16, 1 September 2012 (UTC)
Have a look at Chelsea's page!
The squad section's better. THey have the detail of the Champions League squad. The overall transfer activity. The way the matches are presented is much better (especially the "show" functionality). They've an overview of the competitions. The results by round's interesting, too. And, last but not least, their statistics sections is outstanding! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.13.209.25 ( talk) 01:22, 11 November 2012 (UTC)
Giving more details (like on Chelsea's page) does not prevent you from writing prose! On the contrary, it allows you to do it better! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.218.14.78 ( talk) 01:49, 13 November 2012 (UTC)
Yes it does. It allows you to refer to a statistics table for example. And it's the best way to give comprehensive information, the prose being the best way of describing how things happened during a match, for example or any other event. And it's not a question of repeating stats, but to mention them. Do we have any mention of the champions league squad? No. So to add it wouldn't be a repetition in any way. The same holds for the majority of the points I mentioned, if not for all. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.218.14.78 ( talk) 23:34, 15 November 2012 (UTC)
I don't know about Chelsea's page, but could someone reconfigure the Player's stats table to look more like The Arsenal 2012-13 table? I feel like it makes the difference between substitution appearances and starts, along with total appearances (which is what I think this page needs the most). — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
Adnan7631 (
talk •
contribs) 01:52, 4 June 2013 (UTC)
First of all, this page and Zaha's page contradicted each other, as he is listed as a United played on loan on his page.
Secondly,
Rockybiggs explains it well:
"He is a man u player. Please STOP AMENDING. Please see this league, the transfer Could NOT be left until the summer due to football league rules, see here [1]. Therefore the transfer had to occur in january with a loan back. Please see comments from palace chairman here [2]. Please accept the simeple fact its a transfer, NOT an delayed transfer -- Rockybiggs ( talk) 10:44, 4 February 2013 (UTC)"
And finally, yet more proof that Zaha is indeed a Manchester United player here on the
official Man Utd website where Zaha is listed as an on-loan player. Can't argue that.
So please, stop trying to change reality because for some reason you'd rather have it another way, and accept he is a United player. 90.61.239.252 ( talk) 14:11, 5 February 2013 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on 2012–13 Manchester United F.C. season. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 05:11, 20 June 2017 (UTC)
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
I wonder if the Peterborough friendly is actually worth listing? The article on ManUtd.com says that the game will be played by a "United XI", which is basically code for "the reserves", plus the first-team is playing in another friendly in Hanover the next day. I think the Peterborough game should be removed from the list. – Pee Jay 12:09, 4 July 2012 (UTC)
Not much point of it, is there? Gonna remove it. VEO one five 12:30, 22 July 2012 (UTC)
Would people want a list of the scheduled Premier League games, as well as the games already played? Some of the Spanish teams have this, e.g. 2012–13_Real_Madrid_C.F._season#Matches
I think this would be a nice addition, it makes for an easy way to look up future matches. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Motsjo ( talk • contribs) 07:37, 21 August 2012 (UTC)
I think Fabio and Amos can be removed from squad table. Yes it does show on manutd.com first team squad because there is no page showing 'Players on Loan'. And it shows on the website that Ben Amos will be playing 12-13 season for Hull City. The table will show 0 for all the columns for these players for this season. Whats your view guys?? Shreyas.shridhar ( talk) 09:30, 22 August 2012 (UTC)
As per Ole Solskjaer's inclusion in the 2007-08 squad stats section, Berbatov should be included in this season's squad stats section. Although he did not make any competitive appearances this season, he was part of the squad when the season started and should be mentioned. – Pee Jay 10:16, 1 September 2012 (UTC)
Have a look at Chelsea's page!
The squad section's better. THey have the detail of the Champions League squad. The overall transfer activity. The way the matches are presented is much better (especially the "show" functionality). They've an overview of the competitions. The results by round's interesting, too. And, last but not least, their statistics sections is outstanding! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.13.209.25 ( talk) 01:22, 11 November 2012 (UTC)
Giving more details (like on Chelsea's page) does not prevent you from writing prose! On the contrary, it allows you to do it better! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.218.14.78 ( talk) 01:49, 13 November 2012 (UTC)
Yes it does. It allows you to refer to a statistics table for example. And it's the best way to give comprehensive information, the prose being the best way of describing how things happened during a match, for example or any other event. And it's not a question of repeating stats, but to mention them. Do we have any mention of the champions league squad? No. So to add it wouldn't be a repetition in any way. The same holds for the majority of the points I mentioned, if not for all. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.218.14.78 ( talk) 23:34, 15 November 2012 (UTC)
I don't know about Chelsea's page, but could someone reconfigure the Player's stats table to look more like The Arsenal 2012-13 table? I feel like it makes the difference between substitution appearances and starts, along with total appearances (which is what I think this page needs the most). — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
Adnan7631 (
talk •
contribs) 01:52, 4 June 2013 (UTC)
First of all, this page and Zaha's page contradicted each other, as he is listed as a United played on loan on his page.
Secondly,
Rockybiggs explains it well:
"He is a man u player. Please STOP AMENDING. Please see this league, the transfer Could NOT be left until the summer due to football league rules, see here [1]. Therefore the transfer had to occur in january with a loan back. Please see comments from palace chairman here [2]. Please accept the simeple fact its a transfer, NOT an delayed transfer -- Rockybiggs ( talk) 10:44, 4 February 2013 (UTC)"
And finally, yet more proof that Zaha is indeed a Manchester United player here on the
official Man Utd website where Zaha is listed as an on-loan player. Can't argue that.
So please, stop trying to change reality because for some reason you'd rather have it another way, and accept he is a United player. 90.61.239.252 ( talk) 14:11, 5 February 2013 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on 2012–13 Manchester United F.C. season. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 05:11, 20 June 2017 (UTC)