From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Question

Is there an actual reason why we need a separate article about this, instead of just a subsection in Lethbridge municipal election, 2010? Bearcat ( talk) 17:34, 21 May 2011 (UTC) reply

Geez, no. It should be merged as you suggested. PK T(alk) 17:45, 21 May 2011 (UTC) reply
Does Edmonton's by-elections need articles, or are you suggesting this is related to the previous election because it was held immediately after? 117Avenue ( talk) 20:56, 21 May 2011 (UTC) reply
I don't think we need separate articles for those either; each can easily be dealt with as a subsection of the previous regular election article. But I hadn't seen those until you pointed them out; I only saw this one. Bearcat ( talk) 21:23, 21 May 2011 (UTC) reply
Okay, merge all. 117Avenue ( talk) 22:15, 21 May 2011 (UTC) reply
I agree that a merge is the only sensible course of action. CJCurrie ( talk) 03:19, 22 May 2011 (UTC) reply
Merge with redirect seems appropriate. DigitalC ( talk) 21:33, 28 May 2011 (UTC) reply
Agree. Last time we had a municipal by-election in Ottawa, I put the information in the corresponding Ward article. -- Earl Andrew - talk 01:01, 11 June 2011 (UTC) reply
Agree as well. A section in the previous municipal election article with a redirect seems the best solution. Reso lute 22:15, 19 June 2011 (UTC) reply
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Question

Is there an actual reason why we need a separate article about this, instead of just a subsection in Lethbridge municipal election, 2010? Bearcat ( talk) 17:34, 21 May 2011 (UTC) reply

Geez, no. It should be merged as you suggested. PK T(alk) 17:45, 21 May 2011 (UTC) reply
Does Edmonton's by-elections need articles, or are you suggesting this is related to the previous election because it was held immediately after? 117Avenue ( talk) 20:56, 21 May 2011 (UTC) reply
I don't think we need separate articles for those either; each can easily be dealt with as a subsection of the previous regular election article. But I hadn't seen those until you pointed them out; I only saw this one. Bearcat ( talk) 21:23, 21 May 2011 (UTC) reply
Okay, merge all. 117Avenue ( talk) 22:15, 21 May 2011 (UTC) reply
I agree that a merge is the only sensible course of action. CJCurrie ( talk) 03:19, 22 May 2011 (UTC) reply
Merge with redirect seems appropriate. DigitalC ( talk) 21:33, 28 May 2011 (UTC) reply
Agree. Last time we had a municipal by-election in Ottawa, I put the information in the corresponding Ward article. -- Earl Andrew - talk 01:01, 11 June 2011 (UTC) reply
Agree as well. A section in the previous municipal election article with a redirect seems the best solution. Reso lute 22:15, 19 June 2011 (UTC) reply

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook