2010 Zambian census has been listed as one of the
History good articles under the
good article criteria. If you can improve it further,
please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can
reassess it. Review: December 18, 2016. ( Reviewed version). |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: This looks like an interesting topic, let me see if I can transfer some of my experience using the Ethiopian Census returns to this article. Llywrch ( talk · contribs) 23:12, 27 November 2016 (UTC)
Sorry for the delay in commenting. My off-Wiki life has been busy & I'm behind in the on-Wiki matters I've wanted to attend to.
Update: my responses are inline. Where I marked "Good", I felt it met my expectations; if you see a way to improve on that point, however, feel free to do so.
Another issue with the lead section is that its structure is very similar -- but not enough -- to 2000 Zambian census. The 2000 census includes a number of quality of life statistics that are not included in the 2010, such as safe water, toilets, employment. IMHO, if the same figures were laid out in the same order in both sections, that would help users to compare the data sampled at the two different times.
As I wrote, this article is almost there, & most of these criticisms only became apparent on a second or third reading. Addressing them will make this a clear GA. -- llywrch ( talk) 23:27, 6 December 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on 2010 Zambian census. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 01:13, 19 June 2017 (UTC)
2010 Zambian census has been listed as one of the
History good articles under the
good article criteria. If you can improve it further,
please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can
reassess it. Review: December 18, 2016. ( Reviewed version). |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: This looks like an interesting topic, let me see if I can transfer some of my experience using the Ethiopian Census returns to this article. Llywrch ( talk · contribs) 23:12, 27 November 2016 (UTC)
Sorry for the delay in commenting. My off-Wiki life has been busy & I'm behind in the on-Wiki matters I've wanted to attend to.
Update: my responses are inline. Where I marked "Good", I felt it met my expectations; if you see a way to improve on that point, however, feel free to do so.
Another issue with the lead section is that its structure is very similar -- but not enough -- to 2000 Zambian census. The 2000 census includes a number of quality of life statistics that are not included in the 2010, such as safe water, toilets, employment. IMHO, if the same figures were laid out in the same order in both sections, that would help users to compare the data sampled at the two different times.
As I wrote, this article is almost there, & most of these criticisms only became apparent on a second or third reading. Addressing them will make this a clear GA. -- llywrch ( talk) 23:27, 6 December 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on 2010 Zambian census. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 01:13, 19 June 2017 (UTC)