From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Former good article nominee2008 New Hampshire Democratic presidential primary was a Social sciences and society good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
February 19, 2008 Good article nomineeNot listed

Mike Gravel

He's a democratic party candidate and is on the ballot in New Hampshire so update his results in the table as well. 88.112.174.74 ( talk) 19:42, 8 January 2008 (UTC) reply


Fraud

I read on prison planet that there was a fraud. And Obama actually won. What the fuck. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 201.167.28.217 ( talk) 22:23, 9 January 2008 (UTC) reply

district picture...

2008 New Hampshire Primary results by precinct, which correspond to municipal boundaries
Map showing results by county. [1]

Does anyone know where to get the map and data to make an images like these for the Democrats in New Hampshire? ~  Paul C/ T + 08:06, 11 January 2008 (UTC) reply

We have data for results by county. Perhaps we could use a picture of New Hampshire counties...-- Dem393 ( talk) 01:24, 13 January 2008 (UTC) reply

References

  1. ^ "ElectionCenter2008; Iowa Caucuses (Special Coverage) County Results". CNN. 2008-01-03. CNN. {{ cite episode}}: Unknown parameter |serieslink= ignored (|series-link= suggested) ( help)

Republicans?

Why are republican candidates listed in the results as this article is about the DEMOCRATIC primary? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Munnp001 ( talkcontribs) 00:49, 12 January 2008 (UTC) reply

Hello, Munnp001. I have removed all non-Democratic information from the article, including the section about the recount. This article is meant to provide an in-depth view into the Democratic primary. Any information that applies to the entire primary should be in the other article.-- Dem393 ( talk) 04:51, 12 January 2008 (UTC) reply
The recount is specific to the Democrats. It just happens that one of the republican candidates also demanded a recount. Terjen ( talk) 06:05, 12 January 2008 (UTC) reply
The table shows votes cast for Republican candidates which were tabulated in the Democratic primary by the New Hampshire Secretary of State. Similarly the Republican Primary tabulation includes votes cast for Democratic candidates. I don't know why they do this, but they do, and we go with the source. Sam Blacketer ( talk) 11:03, 12 January 2008 (UTC) reply
Write-in votes explain everything. -- Yellowdesk ( talk) 13:58, 15 January 2008 (UTC) reply

Failed GA review

1. Prose- Fail. Lead section needs work. Needs help from all of the following areas: Wikipedia:Lead section, Wikipedia:Words to avoid. There are a few spelling and grammar errors.

2. Verifiable-Check, but one of the references in the final needs to have a title.

3. Coverage- Fail. There is little information about the campaigns in New Hampshire. What about the NH debate or campaign? Newspaper endorsements?

4. Neutral- Check

5. Stable- Check

6. Images- Fail. There should be at least one picture of the event. Feel free to renominate the article once these concerns are addressed. User:calbear22 ( talk) 03:57, 19 February 2008 (UTC) reply

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Former good article nominee2008 New Hampshire Democratic presidential primary was a Social sciences and society good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
February 19, 2008 Good article nomineeNot listed

Mike Gravel

He's a democratic party candidate and is on the ballot in New Hampshire so update his results in the table as well. 88.112.174.74 ( talk) 19:42, 8 January 2008 (UTC) reply


Fraud

I read on prison planet that there was a fraud. And Obama actually won. What the fuck. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 201.167.28.217 ( talk) 22:23, 9 January 2008 (UTC) reply

district picture...

2008 New Hampshire Primary results by precinct, which correspond to municipal boundaries
Map showing results by county. [1]

Does anyone know where to get the map and data to make an images like these for the Democrats in New Hampshire? ~  Paul C/ T + 08:06, 11 January 2008 (UTC) reply

We have data for results by county. Perhaps we could use a picture of New Hampshire counties...-- Dem393 ( talk) 01:24, 13 January 2008 (UTC) reply

References

  1. ^ "ElectionCenter2008; Iowa Caucuses (Special Coverage) County Results". CNN. 2008-01-03. CNN. {{ cite episode}}: Unknown parameter |serieslink= ignored (|series-link= suggested) ( help)

Republicans?

Why are republican candidates listed in the results as this article is about the DEMOCRATIC primary? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Munnp001 ( talkcontribs) 00:49, 12 January 2008 (UTC) reply

Hello, Munnp001. I have removed all non-Democratic information from the article, including the section about the recount. This article is meant to provide an in-depth view into the Democratic primary. Any information that applies to the entire primary should be in the other article.-- Dem393 ( talk) 04:51, 12 January 2008 (UTC) reply
The recount is specific to the Democrats. It just happens that one of the republican candidates also demanded a recount. Terjen ( talk) 06:05, 12 January 2008 (UTC) reply
The table shows votes cast for Republican candidates which were tabulated in the Democratic primary by the New Hampshire Secretary of State. Similarly the Republican Primary tabulation includes votes cast for Democratic candidates. I don't know why they do this, but they do, and we go with the source. Sam Blacketer ( talk) 11:03, 12 January 2008 (UTC) reply
Write-in votes explain everything. -- Yellowdesk ( talk) 13:58, 15 January 2008 (UTC) reply

Failed GA review

1. Prose- Fail. Lead section needs work. Needs help from all of the following areas: Wikipedia:Lead section, Wikipedia:Words to avoid. There are a few spelling and grammar errors.

2. Verifiable-Check, but one of the references in the final needs to have a title.

3. Coverage- Fail. There is little information about the campaigns in New Hampshire. What about the NH debate or campaign? Newspaper endorsements?

4. Neutral- Check

5. Stable- Check

6. Images- Fail. There should be at least one picture of the event. Feel free to renominate the article once these concerns are addressed. User:calbear22 ( talk) 03:57, 19 February 2008 (UTC) reply


Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook