 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The content of ceskenoviny.cz is taken offline within 2-4 weeks and not preserved on the Web Archive. You might try to find mirrors, but ČTK forbids its customers displaying its copy beoynd such a term as well. -- Malyctenar ( talk) 14:10, 27 February 2008 (UTC)
How is it that this election was able to be done on an open ballot, when the EU (of which the Czech Republic is a member) mandates secret ballots in all elections as a condition of membership? 75.76.213.106 ( talk) 17:08, 12 June 2010 (UTC)
This article is replete with POV material that does not meet Wikipedia's standards. In the lede: "He signed his presidential pledge with a platinum-plated pen allegedly worth up to 1 million koruna (about US$61,300). A Czech company had donated the pen, one of a limited edition of 10, to Klaus,[4] who promised he would exercise his powers cautiously and conservatively during his second term."
Another example: "All parties except for ODS agreed that the vote should be held publicly by acclamation (which they have the majority to decide in the lower house), threatening a blocking of the third round of the joint sitting can not agree on the election method in the third round.[24] More than two thirds of Czechs favor public elections.[25]"
Towards the end: "In his acceptance speech Klaus talked of wanting to be 'President of all Czechs' and his staff spend the following days trying to convey the idea of a nation happy with the outcome. In reality, the fact that his re-election depended on 3 Social Democrats who left their party in deeply suspicious circumstances has thrown a large cloud over what he had hoped would be more a coronation than a re-election."
Reading this article, I can't shake the impression that little effort has been made to suggest even the pretense of neutrality. As it stands, it presents a strongly and rather explicitly negative point of view towards ODS and Vaclav Klaus. Alkibiades14 ( talk) 18:07, 11 February 2015 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 4 external links on Czech presidential election, 2008. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080310171700/http://www.radio.cz:80/en/news/101609 to http://www.radio.cz/en/news/101609#7
- Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.praguepost.com/articles/2008/02/06/presidential-election-2008.php
- Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.praguemonitor.com/en/227/czech_politics/15566/
- Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.eubusiness.com/news-eu/1196260324.18
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 10:07, 4 December 2016 (UTC)
|
| This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The content of ceskenoviny.cz is taken offline within 2-4 weeks and not preserved on the Web Archive. You might try to find mirrors, but ČTK forbids its customers displaying its copy beoynd such a term as well. -- Malyctenar ( talk) 14:10, 27 February 2008 (UTC)
How is it that this election was able to be done on an open ballot, when the EU (of which the Czech Republic is a member) mandates secret ballots in all elections as a condition of membership? 75.76.213.106 ( talk) 17:08, 12 June 2010 (UTC)
This article is replete with POV material that does not meet Wikipedia's standards. In the lede: "He signed his presidential pledge with a platinum-plated pen allegedly worth up to 1 million koruna (about US$61,300). A Czech company had donated the pen, one of a limited edition of 10, to Klaus,[4] who promised he would exercise his powers cautiously and conservatively during his second term."
Another example: "All parties except for ODS agreed that the vote should be held publicly by acclamation (which they have the majority to decide in the lower house), threatening a blocking of the third round of the joint sitting can not agree on the election method in the third round.[24] More than two thirds of Czechs favor public elections.[25]"
Towards the end: "In his acceptance speech Klaus talked of wanting to be 'President of all Czechs' and his staff spend the following days trying to convey the idea of a nation happy with the outcome. In reality, the fact that his re-election depended on 3 Social Democrats who left their party in deeply suspicious circumstances has thrown a large cloud over what he had hoped would be more a coronation than a re-election."
Reading this article, I can't shake the impression that little effort has been made to suggest even the pretense of neutrality. As it stands, it presents a strongly and rather explicitly negative point of view towards ODS and Vaclav Klaus. Alkibiades14 ( talk) 18:07, 11 February 2015 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 4 external links on Czech presidential election, 2008. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080310171700/http://www.radio.cz:80/en/news/101609 to http://www.radio.cz/en/news/101609#7
- Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.praguepost.com/articles/2008/02/06/presidential-election-2008.php
- Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.praguemonitor.com/en/227/czech_politics/15566/
- Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.eubusiness.com/news-eu/1196260324.18
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 10:07, 4 December 2016 (UTC)