This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
2007 article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1 |
This article was nominated for deletion on 2007-02-15. The result of the discussion was speedy keep. |
This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article has been viewed enough times in a single year to make it into the Top 50 Report annual list. This happened in 2007. |
Daily pageviews of this article
A graph should have been displayed here but
graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at
pageviews.wmcloud.org |
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on 2007. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 21:48, 18 September 2016 (UTC)
BroadwayWest insists on including
Radiohead's release of In Rainbows as a significant event, arguing "It marked a major shift in the balance of power in the music industry, and it had a lasting effect.
" and "The US recording industry is worth $50bn PA - this event marked a sea change in the way that one of the USA's major cultural industries sells,markets and distributes its products, and is now favoured by the biggest acts in the industry.
" I'm not sure how international the referred-to music industry is, and I doubt the claim about the event marking a "sea change", a claim which would certainly need to be sourced. Because
BroadwayWest has repeatedly edit-warred this content in, I haven't removed it, but as it stands, it doesn't even have a single source supporting
BroadwayWest's claim. --
Irn (
talk) 01:21, 24 September 2016 (UTC)
The VA Tech shooting appeared on this page for years but was removed without discussion in the beginning of 2017. As the citations in the article make clear, it was one of the biggest news stories of the year internationally. Instead of just reverting with the summary "not internationally notable," please discuss here if you disagree. agtx 03:51, 24 October 2017 (UTC)
... only known in the United States; probably shouldn't have an entry here. — Arthur Rubin (talk) 06:08, 7 February 2018 (UTC)
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. — Community Tech bot ( talk) 01:07, 22 March 2019 (UTC)
See WT:YEARS#Eclipses for a matter relevant to this page. Arthur Rubin (alternate) ( talk) 23:09, 26 June 2019 (UTC)
@ 4me689 What are your nominations for the other 3 images for this 2007 collage? The ganymedian ( talk) 22:53, 28 September 2022 (UTC)
Please let me know if anyone has any disagreements on the images included in the collage, and I will put it up for vote. Thanks The ganymedian ( talk) 22:47, 8 October 2022 (UTC)
The First Image of Steve Jobs was Taken in 2010 when he shows off the iPhone 4 at the 2010 Worldwide Developers Conference. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Steve_Jobs_Headshot_2010-CROP.jpg 173.69.50.140 ( talk) 12:35, 30 April 2023 (UTC)
New here, but was the incorporation of Sports TV Uganda Ltd really that important in 2007? It also does not have a date associated with it. /info/en/?search=2007#October Scipion34 ( talk) 16:54, 24 May 2023 (UTC)
At Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Years#Lead_image, a discussion on whether to depreciate collages in general in going on. Please share your thoughts. Koopinator ( talk) 07:43, 24 December 2023 (UTC)
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
2007 article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1 |
This article was nominated for deletion on 2007-02-15. The result of the discussion was speedy keep. |
This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article has been viewed enough times in a single year to make it into the Top 50 Report annual list. This happened in 2007. |
Daily pageviews of this article
A graph should have been displayed here but
graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at
pageviews.wmcloud.org |
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on 2007. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 21:48, 18 September 2016 (UTC)
BroadwayWest insists on including
Radiohead's release of In Rainbows as a significant event, arguing "It marked a major shift in the balance of power in the music industry, and it had a lasting effect.
" and "The US recording industry is worth $50bn PA - this event marked a sea change in the way that one of the USA's major cultural industries sells,markets and distributes its products, and is now favoured by the biggest acts in the industry.
" I'm not sure how international the referred-to music industry is, and I doubt the claim about the event marking a "sea change", a claim which would certainly need to be sourced. Because
BroadwayWest has repeatedly edit-warred this content in, I haven't removed it, but as it stands, it doesn't even have a single source supporting
BroadwayWest's claim. --
Irn (
talk) 01:21, 24 September 2016 (UTC)
The VA Tech shooting appeared on this page for years but was removed without discussion in the beginning of 2017. As the citations in the article make clear, it was one of the biggest news stories of the year internationally. Instead of just reverting with the summary "not internationally notable," please discuss here if you disagree. agtx 03:51, 24 October 2017 (UTC)
... only known in the United States; probably shouldn't have an entry here. — Arthur Rubin (talk) 06:08, 7 February 2018 (UTC)
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. — Community Tech bot ( talk) 01:07, 22 March 2019 (UTC)
See WT:YEARS#Eclipses for a matter relevant to this page. Arthur Rubin (alternate) ( talk) 23:09, 26 June 2019 (UTC)
@ 4me689 What are your nominations for the other 3 images for this 2007 collage? The ganymedian ( talk) 22:53, 28 September 2022 (UTC)
Please let me know if anyone has any disagreements on the images included in the collage, and I will put it up for vote. Thanks The ganymedian ( talk) 22:47, 8 October 2022 (UTC)
The First Image of Steve Jobs was Taken in 2010 when he shows off the iPhone 4 at the 2010 Worldwide Developers Conference. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Steve_Jobs_Headshot_2010-CROP.jpg 173.69.50.140 ( talk) 12:35, 30 April 2023 (UTC)
New here, but was the incorporation of Sports TV Uganda Ltd really that important in 2007? It also does not have a date associated with it. /info/en/?search=2007#October Scipion34 ( talk) 16:54, 24 May 2023 (UTC)
At Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Years#Lead_image, a discussion on whether to depreciate collages in general in going on. Please share your thoughts. Koopinator ( talk) 07:43, 24 December 2023 (UTC)