This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Which way round should we be writing the dates on these particular articles? There seems to be inconsistency. Is it day-month-year or month-day-year? Mark272 00:39, 22 April 2006 (UTC)
shouldn't all of the transfer dates be july 1 seeing as noone is technically going anywhere until then?
Is transfers for this page just for Premiership teams or is it for the Football League as well? arsenalwwerulz 07:32, 14 July 2006 (UTC)
Is it consensus that the only league Champions etc. on the "xxxx-xx in English football" pages are the top four professional divisions? A lot of the non-league club pages have links to the season pages, but there is nothing of relevance to non-league football on the vast majority of them. - fchd 15:03, 14 July 2006 (UTC)
"It has been suggested, not by me, that this section be split into a new article titled 2006-07 English football transfer deals."
I thought I would put this on here as the actual user who put the proposed split on the page, didn't add it here. So lets see, I think it is a bad idea. The section serves a better purpose on this page. All the other articles have there transfer section on the season page. Why should this be different? So I say no. Gran2 10:48, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
I'm considering trimming this down a bit. It's already really long, and we still have the January transfers, and retirements to come! Any objections? Gran2 14:57, 14 September 2006 (UTC)
Are there any others that you think should/shouldn't be on here? Or any other opinions?
Gran2 19:31, 23 September 2006 (UTC)
Okay, just like the section above, but slightly different, Post-Window Contract Signings, I nominate we change it so that only moves that are permanent are included. I mean all of these loan moves are really insignificant, especially when there only for a few months at the most, I mean:
Come on! I haven't even heard of this guy! So, as I've said in the previous section, this page is getting to long so I say delete the following:
Any objections? Gran2 16:11, 2 December 2006 (UTC)
Just chuck in a few ideas.
Thoughts? HornetMike 13:39, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
Re: tables, I'd suggest the manager table looked a bit like this:
Name | Club | Date of departure | Replacement | Date of appointment |
---|---|---|---|---|
Kevin Blackwell | Leeds United | 20 September 2006 | Dennis Wise | 24 October 2006 |
And the player of the month table like this:
—The preceding unsigned comment was added by HornetMike ( talk • contribs) 15:50, 7 December 2006 (UTC).
Okay, every event, manager change and (with the bbc transfer page links at the bottom) transfer is now referenced. I think, although we haven't really ever wanted to, we are going to have to split the transfers into a separate article. Whic could, thinking about it, if we give it a good lead and make sure that any transfers not listed on the BBC pages is references, could have the potential to be a FL. But maybe we should leave it until the January window closes. But I wouldn't mind if it was done soon.
Like this:
Date | Name | Moving from | Moving to | Fee (£) |
---|---|---|---|---|
2 May 2006 | Grzegorz Rasiak | Tottenham Hotspur | Southampton | £2m |
Gran2 19:53, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
Right the player/manager of the month table is now done. I'll add it to the article later as the refs don't have sites or retrieval dates. I'm beginning to see that this page is basically a collection of lists, not that that's a bad thing. Gran 2 13:16, 17 March 2007 (UTC)
References
I see there's been a bit of a disagreement re: Van Der Sar's injury. I have to say I don't think there's anything notable about it. The difference between this injury and the Cech/Cudicini one is that the latter sparked a media feud between Chelsea/Reading and was extraordinairy because of the extent of the injury to both keepers, and the fact it happened to two keepers in one match. I'd remove the Van Der Sar stuff, but in the spirit of fairness probably get rid of the Niemi injury as well - it looked serious but wasn't really in the end. HornetMike 13:38, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
There should be something in here about this really, it was massive news and the repercussions are still ongoing, it should at least be mentioned 80.195.80.148 ( talk) 15:01, 16 January 2008 (UTC)
During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!
-- JeffGBot ( talk) 00:40, 15 June 2011 (UTC)
During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!
-- JeffGBot ( talk) 00:40, 15 June 2011 (UTC)
During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!
-- JeffGBot ( talk) 00:40, 15 June 2011 (UTC)
During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!
-- JeffGBot ( talk) 00:40, 15 June 2011 (UTC)
During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!
-- JeffGBot ( talk) 00:40, 15 June 2011 (UTC)
During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!
-- JeffGBot ( talk) 00:41, 15 June 2011 (UTC)
During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!
-- JeffGBot ( talk) 00:41, 15 June 2011 (UTC)
During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!
-- JeffGBot ( talk) 00:41, 15 June 2011 (UTC)
During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!
-- JeffGBot ( talk) 00:41, 15 June 2011 (UTC)
During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!
-- JeffGBot ( talk) 00:41, 15 June 2011 (UTC)
During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!
-- JeffGBot ( talk) 00:41, 15 June 2011 (UTC)
During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!
-- JeffGBot ( talk) 00:43, 15 June 2011 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on 2006–07 in English football. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 21:42, 18 September 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 8 external links on 2006–07 in English football. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.watfordfc.premiumtv.co.uk/page/NewsDetail/0%2C%2C10400~1027381%2C00.html{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://icbirmingham.icnetwork.co.uk/mail/blues/tm_headline%3Dlegendary-keeper-schofield-dies%26method%3Dfull%26objectid%3D18038847%26siteid%3D50002-name_page.htmlWhen you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 20:11, 17 June 2017 (UTC)
This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Which way round should we be writing the dates on these particular articles? There seems to be inconsistency. Is it day-month-year or month-day-year? Mark272 00:39, 22 April 2006 (UTC)
shouldn't all of the transfer dates be july 1 seeing as noone is technically going anywhere until then?
Is transfers for this page just for Premiership teams or is it for the Football League as well? arsenalwwerulz 07:32, 14 July 2006 (UTC)
Is it consensus that the only league Champions etc. on the "xxxx-xx in English football" pages are the top four professional divisions? A lot of the non-league club pages have links to the season pages, but there is nothing of relevance to non-league football on the vast majority of them. - fchd 15:03, 14 July 2006 (UTC)
"It has been suggested, not by me, that this section be split into a new article titled 2006-07 English football transfer deals."
I thought I would put this on here as the actual user who put the proposed split on the page, didn't add it here. So lets see, I think it is a bad idea. The section serves a better purpose on this page. All the other articles have there transfer section on the season page. Why should this be different? So I say no. Gran2 10:48, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
I'm considering trimming this down a bit. It's already really long, and we still have the January transfers, and retirements to come! Any objections? Gran2 14:57, 14 September 2006 (UTC)
Are there any others that you think should/shouldn't be on here? Or any other opinions?
Gran2 19:31, 23 September 2006 (UTC)
Okay, just like the section above, but slightly different, Post-Window Contract Signings, I nominate we change it so that only moves that are permanent are included. I mean all of these loan moves are really insignificant, especially when there only for a few months at the most, I mean:
Come on! I haven't even heard of this guy! So, as I've said in the previous section, this page is getting to long so I say delete the following:
Any objections? Gran2 16:11, 2 December 2006 (UTC)
Just chuck in a few ideas.
Thoughts? HornetMike 13:39, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
Re: tables, I'd suggest the manager table looked a bit like this:
Name | Club | Date of departure | Replacement | Date of appointment |
---|---|---|---|---|
Kevin Blackwell | Leeds United | 20 September 2006 | Dennis Wise | 24 October 2006 |
And the player of the month table like this:
—The preceding unsigned comment was added by HornetMike ( talk • contribs) 15:50, 7 December 2006 (UTC).
Okay, every event, manager change and (with the bbc transfer page links at the bottom) transfer is now referenced. I think, although we haven't really ever wanted to, we are going to have to split the transfers into a separate article. Whic could, thinking about it, if we give it a good lead and make sure that any transfers not listed on the BBC pages is references, could have the potential to be a FL. But maybe we should leave it until the January window closes. But I wouldn't mind if it was done soon.
Like this:
Date | Name | Moving from | Moving to | Fee (£) |
---|---|---|---|---|
2 May 2006 | Grzegorz Rasiak | Tottenham Hotspur | Southampton | £2m |
Gran2 19:53, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
Right the player/manager of the month table is now done. I'll add it to the article later as the refs don't have sites or retrieval dates. I'm beginning to see that this page is basically a collection of lists, not that that's a bad thing. Gran 2 13:16, 17 March 2007 (UTC)
References
I see there's been a bit of a disagreement re: Van Der Sar's injury. I have to say I don't think there's anything notable about it. The difference between this injury and the Cech/Cudicini one is that the latter sparked a media feud between Chelsea/Reading and was extraordinairy because of the extent of the injury to both keepers, and the fact it happened to two keepers in one match. I'd remove the Van Der Sar stuff, but in the spirit of fairness probably get rid of the Niemi injury as well - it looked serious but wasn't really in the end. HornetMike 13:38, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
There should be something in here about this really, it was massive news and the repercussions are still ongoing, it should at least be mentioned 80.195.80.148 ( talk) 15:01, 16 January 2008 (UTC)
During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!
-- JeffGBot ( talk) 00:40, 15 June 2011 (UTC)
During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!
-- JeffGBot ( talk) 00:40, 15 June 2011 (UTC)
During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!
-- JeffGBot ( talk) 00:40, 15 June 2011 (UTC)
During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!
-- JeffGBot ( talk) 00:40, 15 June 2011 (UTC)
During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!
-- JeffGBot ( talk) 00:40, 15 June 2011 (UTC)
During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!
-- JeffGBot ( talk) 00:41, 15 June 2011 (UTC)
During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!
-- JeffGBot ( talk) 00:41, 15 June 2011 (UTC)
During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!
-- JeffGBot ( talk) 00:41, 15 June 2011 (UTC)
During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!
-- JeffGBot ( talk) 00:41, 15 June 2011 (UTC)
During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!
-- JeffGBot ( talk) 00:41, 15 June 2011 (UTC)
During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!
-- JeffGBot ( talk) 00:41, 15 June 2011 (UTC)
During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!
-- JeffGBot ( talk) 00:43, 15 June 2011 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on 2006–07 in English football. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 21:42, 18 September 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 8 external links on 2006–07 in English football. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.watfordfc.premiumtv.co.uk/page/NewsDetail/0%2C%2C10400~1027381%2C00.html{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://icbirmingham.icnetwork.co.uk/mail/blues/tm_headline%3Dlegendary-keeper-schofield-dies%26method%3Dfull%26objectid%3D18038847%26siteid%3D50002-name_page.htmlWhen you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 20:11, 17 June 2017 (UTC)