From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:2005–06 S.L. Benfica season/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Jaguar ( talk · contribs) 16:12, 29 November 2016 (UTC) reply


As promised, I'll check these over soon. JAG UAR  16:12, 29 November 2016 (UTC) reply

Disambiguations: No links found.

Linkrot: No linkrot found in this article.

Checking against the GA criteria

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose, no copyvios, spelling and grammar): b ( MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
    "The 2005–06 European football season was the 102nd season of Sport Lisboa e Benfica's existence" - embolden the title My mistake
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a ( reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c ( OR):
    No original research found. AGF for offline sources
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a ( major aspects): b ( focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
    NPOV
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b ( appropriate use with suitable captions):
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:

Pleasure to review. Couldn't find any issues so will pass outright. JAG UAR  22:11, 29 November 2016 (UTC) reply

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on 2005–06 S.L. Benfica season. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

checkY An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 15:16, 17 June 2017 (UTC) reply

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:2005–06 S.L. Benfica season/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Jaguar ( talk · contribs) 16:12, 29 November 2016 (UTC) reply


As promised, I'll check these over soon. JAG UAR  16:12, 29 November 2016 (UTC) reply

Disambiguations: No links found.

Linkrot: No linkrot found in this article.

Checking against the GA criteria

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose, no copyvios, spelling and grammar): b ( MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
    "The 2005–06 European football season was the 102nd season of Sport Lisboa e Benfica's existence" - embolden the title My mistake
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a ( reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c ( OR):
    No original research found. AGF for offline sources
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a ( major aspects): b ( focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
    NPOV
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b ( appropriate use with suitable captions):
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:

Pleasure to review. Couldn't find any issues so will pass outright. JAG UAR  22:11, 29 November 2016 (UTC) reply

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on 2005–06 S.L. Benfica season. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

checkY An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 15:16, 17 June 2017 (UTC) reply


Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook