This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Shouldn't there be a mention that one of their players may have been taking performance enhancing drugs during the season? The Red Peacock ( talk) 19:06, 7 May 2009 (UTC)
No evidence? You sure about that? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.176.140.120 ( talk) 16:03, 31 July 2009 (UTC)
Ortiz comfirmed he failed the test. [1]-- Subman758 ( talk) 16:18, 31 July 2009 (UTC)
Furthermore I have already gone on the record as stating nothing should be taken from the Sox. Yeah their players MAY have used. Steroids, though don't give you the ability to read the best closer in the league better. Nothing should be taken from the Sox. NO ASTERISK'S should be added to any Title, or Record achieved in this era, of Major League Baseball. They were not against the rules of baseball until 2005, and I truly believe US THE FANS caused this whole steroid mess in the first place.-- Subman758 ( talk) 04:26, 1 August 2009 (UTC)
What is the wikipedia rule on OBP? Why isn't the hitters OPB shown? That's just as commonly recognized as all the others and is far more vital than any of the others. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.191.166.243 ( talk) 17:39, 8 August 2009 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on 2004 Boston Red Sox season. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 10:17, 17 June 2017 (UTC)
This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Shouldn't there be a mention that one of their players may have been taking performance enhancing drugs during the season? The Red Peacock ( talk) 19:06, 7 May 2009 (UTC)
No evidence? You sure about that? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.176.140.120 ( talk) 16:03, 31 July 2009 (UTC)
Ortiz comfirmed he failed the test. [1]-- Subman758 ( talk) 16:18, 31 July 2009 (UTC)
Furthermore I have already gone on the record as stating nothing should be taken from the Sox. Yeah their players MAY have used. Steroids, though don't give you the ability to read the best closer in the league better. Nothing should be taken from the Sox. NO ASTERISK'S should be added to any Title, or Record achieved in this era, of Major League Baseball. They were not against the rules of baseball until 2005, and I truly believe US THE FANS caused this whole steroid mess in the first place.-- Subman758 ( talk) 04:26, 1 August 2009 (UTC)
What is the wikipedia rule on OBP? Why isn't the hitters OPB shown? That's just as commonly recognized as all the others and is far more vital than any of the others. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.191.166.243 ( talk) 17:39, 8 August 2009 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on 2004 Boston Red Sox season. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 10:17, 17 June 2017 (UTC)