This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
1st Intelligence, Surveillance and Reconnaissance Brigade article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1 |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
@
Coldstreamer20: @
Coldstreamer: in
this edit you wrote in your summary: "Please don't change, we've already made the decision to keep the structures in the "spoiler format". I understand it might look better to you, but this has already been discussed
" - there is no discussion regarding format, either here or in the archives. Can you you post a link to that discussion here, for any others that might be interested in it? Thanks -
wolf 17:17, 1 December 2021 (UTC) (oops) -
wolf 10:13, 2 December 2021 (UTC)
B) As per WP:MOSCOLLAPSE, it's right in bold print; "Collapsible templates should not conceal article content by default upon page loading", so unless you think there's a compelling reason otherwise, those collapsed lists in the articles you linked above, and any others you know about, should probably have the collapsing markup removed. Apparently it causes problems for accessibility, while scrolling doesn't, even for lengthy lists. - wolf 21:56, 8 January 2022 (UTC)
So other than that, I'm not sure what you would want to discuss, this isn't about in whose "opinion" the page looks prettier, it's an access issue, which means that when you collapse those lists, some people can't access them. Just because you have a like-minded friend, or if you were to somehow gain a local consensus, even at a WikiProject, that fact isn't going to change. The MOS is a guideline, and it's very clear on the issue. I'm not sure what else there is to say, I'm pretty sure that collapsing markup needs to be removed. (imo) - wolf 22:27, 10 January 2022 (UTC)
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
1st Intelligence, Surveillance and Reconnaissance Brigade article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1 |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
@
Coldstreamer20: @
Coldstreamer: in
this edit you wrote in your summary: "Please don't change, we've already made the decision to keep the structures in the "spoiler format". I understand it might look better to you, but this has already been discussed
" - there is no discussion regarding format, either here or in the archives. Can you you post a link to that discussion here, for any others that might be interested in it? Thanks -
wolf 17:17, 1 December 2021 (UTC) (oops) -
wolf 10:13, 2 December 2021 (UTC)
B) As per WP:MOSCOLLAPSE, it's right in bold print; "Collapsible templates should not conceal article content by default upon page loading", so unless you think there's a compelling reason otherwise, those collapsed lists in the articles you linked above, and any others you know about, should probably have the collapsing markup removed. Apparently it causes problems for accessibility, while scrolling doesn't, even for lengthy lists. - wolf 21:56, 8 January 2022 (UTC)
So other than that, I'm not sure what you would want to discuss, this isn't about in whose "opinion" the page looks prettier, it's an access issue, which means that when you collapse those lists, some people can't access them. Just because you have a like-minded friend, or if you were to somehow gain a local consensus, even at a WikiProject, that fact isn't going to change. The MOS is a guideline, and it's very clear on the issue. I'm not sure what else there is to say, I'm pretty sure that collapsing markup needs to be removed. (imo) - wolf 22:27, 10 January 2022 (UTC)