This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Military history: European / German / World War II This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status: Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met Associated task forces: /  European military history task force German military history task force World War II task force Germany Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Germany, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Germany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GermanyWikipedia:WikiProject GermanyTemplate:WikiProject GermanyGermany articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

I wonder if Goering's elite soldiers were fighting in the Spanish Civil War, along with the Legion Condor? Especially because the German Luftwaffe played a very important role there. - Does anybody know the facts? 79.193.0.83 ( talk) 19:47, 21 June 2008 (UTC) reply

Hmm, there seems to be something wrong about the 1944 history. The article states that the division arrived to the area in mid-September, roughly 1,5 months after the uprising started. Yet, it also claims that it took part in the fights against the Soviet offensive that was halted... on August 3rd. // Halibu tt 16:07, 23 December 2006 (UTC) reply

an answer: [1] -- 83.5.145.57 09:22, 28 February 2007 (UTC) reply

The text stated the Polish 1st Division was destroyed by the HG PzDiv in mid-April, 1945. This cannot be true, because the Polish 1st Division (Polish People's Army = LWP) was near Berlin at that time, and the HG PzDiv was in the vicinity of Dresden. However, from April 22-24, the HG was in the 4. PzArmee, which attacked the inter-army boundary of the Polish 2nd Army (LWP) and the Soviet 52nd Army. Penetrating the boundary, the HG and one other division enjoyed two days of overrunning the communications and logistics trains of the two opposing armies. Finally, on April 24, the German attack was stopped by the Soviet 5th Guards Army. As far as I can determine, no divisions of the LWP were destroyed by the Germans, the closest thing to this sort of event being the heavy casualties taken by the LWP 1st Division at Lenino in late 1943. Postscript: See the main article citation for Hans von Ahlfen, detailing the Soviet and Polish units the Germans believed to have strongly damaged or destroyed. I believe the article's original reference to the "Polish 1st Division" was a confused reference to the Polish 1st Tank Corps (LWP). PPS: Correction to above. According to a thorough Polish reference on the LWP in World War II, Polish losses in this battle were indeed severe. See the citation in the main article for details. W. B. Wilson 15:44, 8 February 2007 (UTC) reply

the fourth citation is confusing, as it is claimed in the article to verify alleged war crimes. but when one reads the citation it says nothing about human shields but simply states how many Polish soldiers were killed. can someone who has the "source" clarify this?

-- Jadger 04:23, 26 February 2007 (UTC) reply

· The numerical notation is confusing; looking in the edit text for the page, this note actually refers to the external link http://info-poland.buffalo.edu/classroom/uprising.html Professor Peter K. Gessner State University of New York at Buffalo - the fourth (non-external) citation that you saw about Polish casualties was referenced earlier in the text when the fighting of April 1945 was discussed. W. B. Wilson 12:01, 26 February 2007 (UTC) reply

ok thanks, that is weird, it says #4 in the text, but it is the 3rd external link. I understand why I confused the two now.

-- Jadger 08:25, 27 February 2007 (UTC) reply

Image:PGDA - FPD HG.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot ( talk) 15:18, 8 March 2008 (UTC) reply

The Order of Battle of the Hermann Goring Division through November 1942 detailed at this article does not indicate it included the 5. Fallschirmjager Regiment. That regiment did in fact fight in Tunisia, but there is no indication it was part of the "Hermann Goring Division" (operating then as Kampfgruppe Schmid commanded by Generalmajor Joseph Schmid). See extensive history of its role in the battle here: 5. Fallschirmjager Regiment in Tunisia, Part 1, November-December 1942. If it can be established that the 5 Fallschirmjager fought under Kampfgruppe Schmid in Africa the claim may be restored. Wikiuser100 ( talk) 23:30, 6 July 2015 (UTC) reply

Almost none of this extensive article is cited (tagged since 2013), except for the sections on Eat Prussia and Alleged war crimes. I'm going to check it for the obviously dubious content and remove it. The rest I will comment it out in the next few days unless there are other editors interested in providing WP:RS citations. K.e.coffman ( talk) 06:16, 9 March 2016 (UTC) reply

The recent IP edits restored the dubious claims and POV language (all unsourced from 2013), including what sounds link 1940s propaganda:

• "unswerving loyalty"
• "acquitted themselves well"
• "captured and neutralised by Fallschirmjäger'" (unrelated unit, the only connection is that some personnel previously served in the division)
• "regiment again acquitted itself well"
• "During this battle, the regiment gained a reputation for steadfastness under fire." (tagged since 2008)
• "was thrown back into the line"; "thrown back into combat"
• "Despite valiant breakout attempts..."

I have reverted the IP editor once, but another one came along are reinstated the dubious content. Can other editors have a look at these edits? K.e.coffman ( talk) 23:52, 11 March 2016 (UTC) reply