This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Vietnam Low‑importance This article is part of WikiProject Vietnam, an attempt to create a comprehensive, neutral, and accurate representation of Vietnam on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.VietnamWikipedia:WikiProject VietnamTemplate:WikiProject VietnamVietnam articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Military history: Asian / Southeast Asia / Cold War / Post-Cold War This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status: Referencing and citation: criterion met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met Associated task forces: /  Asian military history task force Southeast Asian military history task force Cold War task force (c. 1945 – c. 1989) Post-Cold War task force

The content so far is following up with 2nd Division (Vietnam) and 3rd Division (Vietnam), in that it uses sources dubbed "Official Military History" from its primary adversary in a conflict. As such it appears to be WP:CONTENTFORK with scant or virtually no details on the topic itself. Neither is it even treating the subject evenhandedly and existing as a repository for wikilinks. Virtually no details other than as a reference to activities of others are found here. 45.62.243.176 ( talk) 07:56, 6 November 2018 (UTC) reply

A page about a military division is not a WP:CONTENTFORK! Do something useful and provide WP:RS if you disagree with what I have written, or, better yet leave Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/A bicyclette#06 November 2018 Mztourist ( talk) 08:06, 6 November 2018 (UTC) reply

I don't get why you keep calling me a sockpuppet, this is a clearly paranoid accusation. Your edit should be in line with a neutral point of view, including indication of the source of the content. I'd recommend you look for relevant talk pages or discussion boards or wikiprojects if you want other users to help you find neutral WP:RS for improvement. Not my job, go find someone with more knowledge than 2 books. 45.62.243.176 ( talk) 08:14, 6 November 2018 (UTC) reply

Cos you're a sock/proxy of an indefinitely blocked User who I have to have blocked every day or so... Mztourist ( talk) 08:20, 6 November 2018 (UTC) reply

You must live such an exciting life with so much time on your hands. 45.62.243.176 ( talk) 08:24, 6 November 2018 (UTC) reply

I am creating content; you are the one who is indefinitely blocked but trying desperately to push your POV through socks. Mztourist ( talk) 08:27, 6 November 2018 (UTC) reply

Aside from your continual strange accusations against me, you must feel so accomplished to do so much in life! Congratulations. 45.62.243.176 ( talk) 08:35, 6 November 2018 (UTC) reply

You can respond to the SPI Mztourist ( talk) 10:00, 6 November 2018 (UTC) reply

And of course 45.62.243.176 was blocked as a sock/proxy. Mztourist ( talk) 08:35, 9 November 2018 (UTC) reply