1st Brigade Combat Team, 10th Mountain Division (United States) has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | |||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
Current status: Good article |
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
1st Brigade Combat Team, 10th Mountain Division (United States) article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
I noticed that under the Campaign Streamers section, services in both World Wars were credited to 1945. I don't want to mess with it because I'm not sure what to change it to, but I know that this is incorrect. -- Starstriker7( Talk) 20:59, 20 July 2009 (UTC)
I was reading the article and noticed a section on "Contengencies". Should this be "Contingencies" or is this a military specific term that I just don't know?--HistorianBell 21:22, 26 August 2009 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by HistorianBell ( talk • contribs)
During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!
-- JeffGBot ( talk) 03:33, 10 June 2011 (UTC)
During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!
-- JeffGBot ( talk) 03:33, 10 June 2011 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on
1st Brigade Combat Team, 10th Mountain Division (United States). Please take a moment to review
my edit. If necessary, add {{
cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{
nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.
Cheers.— cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 22:33, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on 1st Brigade Combat Team, 10th Mountain Division (United States). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 03:27, 12 May 2017 (UTC)
The article was listed as a Good article in 2009. From the history, I can see that the article has gone a through a lot of revisions, and unsourced content was added. Section 3 has only two citations, Sections 1, 2.5 & 2.4, don't have any citations. Section 2.8 is completely empty. Apart from the referencing issues, the MOS has also been compromised. I feel that that the article is no longer eligible to have the GA tag. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga ( talk • mail) 16:17, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation. If Krishna Chaitanya Velaga has other MOS concerns, these should not affect the GA status; I'm sure they will let you know what they mean by sections 2.5 and 2.8 by giving you the actual section headers. BlueMoonset ( talk) 15:44, 31 December 2017 (UTC)
Happy to help re-add sources if necessary. Just let me know what needs to be fixed at this point. — Ed! (talk) 18:54, 2 January 2018 (UTC)
1st Brigade Combat Team, 10th Mountain Division (United States) has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | |||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
Current status: Good article |
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
1st Brigade Combat Team, 10th Mountain Division (United States) article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
I noticed that under the Campaign Streamers section, services in both World Wars were credited to 1945. I don't want to mess with it because I'm not sure what to change it to, but I know that this is incorrect. -- Starstriker7( Talk) 20:59, 20 July 2009 (UTC)
I was reading the article and noticed a section on "Contengencies". Should this be "Contingencies" or is this a military specific term that I just don't know?--HistorianBell 21:22, 26 August 2009 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by HistorianBell ( talk • contribs)
During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!
-- JeffGBot ( talk) 03:33, 10 June 2011 (UTC)
During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!
-- JeffGBot ( talk) 03:33, 10 June 2011 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on
1st Brigade Combat Team, 10th Mountain Division (United States). Please take a moment to review
my edit. If necessary, add {{
cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{
nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.
Cheers.— cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 22:33, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on 1st Brigade Combat Team, 10th Mountain Division (United States). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 03:27, 12 May 2017 (UTC)
The article was listed as a Good article in 2009. From the history, I can see that the article has gone a through a lot of revisions, and unsourced content was added. Section 3 has only two citations, Sections 1, 2.5 & 2.4, don't have any citations. Section 2.8 is completely empty. Apart from the referencing issues, the MOS has also been compromised. I feel that that the article is no longer eligible to have the GA tag. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga ( talk • mail) 16:17, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation. If Krishna Chaitanya Velaga has other MOS concerns, these should not affect the GA status; I'm sure they will let you know what they mean by sections 2.5 and 2.8 by giving you the actual section headers. BlueMoonset ( talk) 15:44, 31 December 2017 (UTC)
Happy to help re-add sources if necessary. Just let me know what needs to be fixed at this point. — Ed! (talk) 18:54, 2 January 2018 (UTC)