1 vs. 100 (American game show) has been listed as one of the
Media and drama good articles under the
good article criteria. If you can improve it further,
please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can
reassess it. Review: November 29, 2017. ( Reviewed version). |
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
1 vs. 100 (American game show) article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1 |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
I have removed the section of this article which listed notable people who have appeared as part of the 'mob', as it was almost entirely unreferenced and utterly trivial. The 'mob' in this show is equivalent to a normal studio audience, and we wouldn't normally list notable people who've appeared in a show's audience unless they played some more significant role on that show. Robofish ( talk) 18:36, 4 January 2011 (UTC)
During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!
-- JeffGBot ( talk) 12:30, 9 June 2011 (UTC)
During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!
-- JeffGBot ( talk) 12:32, 9 June 2011 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on 1 vs. 100 (U.S. game show). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 15:16, 31 December 2016 (UTC)
I'm trying to remember how this game works, but the only details on the page about the game itself (as opposed to things about the game's history, network, and so on) are is that "the one" gains money as he eliminates members of "the mob" and loses for an incorrect answer. It doesn't explain anything like the lifelines I remember there being and that, if I recall correctly, the questions are multiple-choice trivia. Am I just missing something or is the information missing?-- Macks2008 ( talk) 03:33, 9 June 2017 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on 1 vs. 100 (U.S. game show). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 21:56, 16 June 2017 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: AmericanAir88 ( talk · contribs) 03:31, 26 November 2017 (UTC)
Good day, I hope you are having a fantastic weekend. Due to your fantastic dedication and improvement to "Hollywood Game Night", I am reviewing this nomination as well. I hope we can get through this easy and stress free.
Welcome to the review for 1 vs. 100. I structure my reviews like a trial. My reviews are all about your voice as I will simply post issues and you will do the work solving them. If necessary I will make very minor copy edits to the article if I feel they don't need a whole bullet point dedicated to them. Anyway, I am looking forward to working with you again. AmericanAir88 ( talk) 00:11, 28 November 2017 (UTC)
AmericanAir88 ( talk) 01:30, 28 November 2017 (UTC)
@ Bcschneider53: Everything looks fantastic. All issues have been addressed. The review table will now begin. AmericanAir88 ( talk) 23:05, 28 November 2017 (UTC)
@ Bcschneider53: Some of the grammar is very basic and confusing. Try to do a run through of the article and fix up the choppy sentences. Once that is fixed, the first two boxes will be filled. — Preceding unsigned comment added by AmericanAir88 ( talk • contribs)
Rate | Attribute | Review Comment |
---|---|---|
1. Well-written: | ||
1a. the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct. | Very clear and concise | |
1b. it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation. | Compiles | |
2. Verifiable with no original research: | ||
2a. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline. | Each sentence has a reference | |
2b. reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose). | All reliable sources | |
2c. it contains no original research. | Everything referenced | |
2d. it contains no copyright violations or plagiarism. | No violations | |
3. Broad in its coverage: | ||
3a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic. | Covers all aspects | |
3b. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style). | Stays on task | |
4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each. | Very Neutral | |
5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute. | Very Stable | |
6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio: | ||
6a. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content. | Proper Images | |
6b. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions. | Relevant Images | |
7. Overall assessment. | Passed |
Congratulations on passing. Your dedication and hard work was fantastic. I hope we can work together in the near future. Have a fantastic day. If there is any other reviews you need or articles you need help on don't hesitate to ask. Thank you AmericanAir88 ( talk) 03:34, 29 November 2017 (UTC)
1 vs. 100 (American game show) has been listed as one of the
Media and drama good articles under the
good article criteria. If you can improve it further,
please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can
reassess it. Review: November 29, 2017. ( Reviewed version). |
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
1 vs. 100 (American game show) article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1 |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
I have removed the section of this article which listed notable people who have appeared as part of the 'mob', as it was almost entirely unreferenced and utterly trivial. The 'mob' in this show is equivalent to a normal studio audience, and we wouldn't normally list notable people who've appeared in a show's audience unless they played some more significant role on that show. Robofish ( talk) 18:36, 4 January 2011 (UTC)
During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!
-- JeffGBot ( talk) 12:30, 9 June 2011 (UTC)
During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!
-- JeffGBot ( talk) 12:32, 9 June 2011 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on 1 vs. 100 (U.S. game show). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 15:16, 31 December 2016 (UTC)
I'm trying to remember how this game works, but the only details on the page about the game itself (as opposed to things about the game's history, network, and so on) are is that "the one" gains money as he eliminates members of "the mob" and loses for an incorrect answer. It doesn't explain anything like the lifelines I remember there being and that, if I recall correctly, the questions are multiple-choice trivia. Am I just missing something or is the information missing?-- Macks2008 ( talk) 03:33, 9 June 2017 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on 1 vs. 100 (U.S. game show). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 21:56, 16 June 2017 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: AmericanAir88 ( talk · contribs) 03:31, 26 November 2017 (UTC)
Good day, I hope you are having a fantastic weekend. Due to your fantastic dedication and improvement to "Hollywood Game Night", I am reviewing this nomination as well. I hope we can get through this easy and stress free.
Welcome to the review for 1 vs. 100. I structure my reviews like a trial. My reviews are all about your voice as I will simply post issues and you will do the work solving them. If necessary I will make very minor copy edits to the article if I feel they don't need a whole bullet point dedicated to them. Anyway, I am looking forward to working with you again. AmericanAir88 ( talk) 00:11, 28 November 2017 (UTC)
AmericanAir88 ( talk) 01:30, 28 November 2017 (UTC)
@ Bcschneider53: Everything looks fantastic. All issues have been addressed. The review table will now begin. AmericanAir88 ( talk) 23:05, 28 November 2017 (UTC)
@ Bcschneider53: Some of the grammar is very basic and confusing. Try to do a run through of the article and fix up the choppy sentences. Once that is fixed, the first two boxes will be filled. — Preceding unsigned comment added by AmericanAir88 ( talk • contribs)
Rate | Attribute | Review Comment |
---|---|---|
1. Well-written: | ||
1a. the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct. | Very clear and concise | |
1b. it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation. | Compiles | |
2. Verifiable with no original research: | ||
2a. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline. | Each sentence has a reference | |
2b. reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose). | All reliable sources | |
2c. it contains no original research. | Everything referenced | |
2d. it contains no copyright violations or plagiarism. | No violations | |
3. Broad in its coverage: | ||
3a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic. | Covers all aspects | |
3b. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style). | Stays on task | |
4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each. | Very Neutral | |
5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute. | Very Stable | |
6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio: | ||
6a. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content. | Proper Images | |
6b. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions. | Relevant Images | |
7. Overall assessment. | Passed |
Congratulations on passing. Your dedication and hard work was fantastic. I hope we can work together in the near future. Have a fantastic day. If there is any other reviews you need or articles you need help on don't hesitate to ask. Thank you AmericanAir88 ( talk) 03:34, 29 November 2017 (UTC)