From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:1999 Matamoros standoff/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Buidhe ( talk · contribs) 11:11, 18 January 2019 (UTC) reply


Forthcoming. b ui dhe (formerly Catrìona) 11:11, 18 January 2019 (UTC) reply

OK, this is a great article, can't find much to criticize. The main issue I found is the paragraph starting with "On 28 July 2000, during the 48th Annual Awards Ceremony..." which seems to veer off topic. Wouldn't it be enough to note that the agents received the award and the reason why? (especially considering it's cited to a primary source). b uidh e 11:35, 19 January 2019 (UTC) reply

  • @ Buidhe: Hello, thank you for the review! I've trimmed down the paragraph and kept some of the off-topic info as a footnote. Let me know if this is OK. Cheers, MX ( ) 18:27, 19 January 2019 (UTC) reply
Good Article review progress box
Criteria: 1a. prose () 1b. MoS () 2a. ref layout () 2b. cites WP:RS () 2c. no WP:OR () 2d. no WP:CV ()
3a. broadness () 3b. focus () 4. neutral () 5. stable () 6a. free or tagged images () 6b. pics relevant ()
Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:1999 Matamoros standoff/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Buidhe ( talk · contribs) 11:11, 18 January 2019 (UTC) reply


Forthcoming. b ui dhe (formerly Catrìona) 11:11, 18 January 2019 (UTC) reply

OK, this is a great article, can't find much to criticize. The main issue I found is the paragraph starting with "On 28 July 2000, during the 48th Annual Awards Ceremony..." which seems to veer off topic. Wouldn't it be enough to note that the agents received the award and the reason why? (especially considering it's cited to a primary source). b uidh e 11:35, 19 January 2019 (UTC) reply

  • @ Buidhe: Hello, thank you for the review! I've trimmed down the paragraph and kept some of the off-topic info as a footnote. Let me know if this is OK. Cheers, MX ( ) 18:27, 19 January 2019 (UTC) reply
Good Article review progress box
Criteria: 1a. prose () 1b. MoS () 2a. ref layout () 2b. cites WP:RS () 2c. no WP:OR () 2d. no WP:CV ()
3a. broadness () 3b. focus () 4. neutral () 5. stable () 6a. free or tagged images () 6b. pics relevant ()
Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook