This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

United States This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale. Elections and Referendums This article is within the scope of WikiProject Elections and Referendums, an ongoing effort to improve the quality of, expand upon and create new articles relating to elections, electoral reform and other aspects of democratic decision-making. For more information, visit our project page.Elections and ReferendumsWikipedia:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsTemplate:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsElections and Referendums articles

At this edit and this edit, Editor SecretName101 reverted two edits of mine without the courtesy of an explanation. Editor SecretName101: why did you revert those edits?

— Trappist the monk ( talk) 12:54, 23 July 2023 (UTC) reply

@ Trappist the monk The sole determinable change you made were changes that damaged many citations (among other things, removing the actual article titles from news articles). even in good faith, these edits damaged rather than improved these citations SecretName101 ( talk) 19:53, 23 July 2023 (UTC) reply

or so it appeared to me at the time to be the source of why some of these citations had errors, hence why I reverted SecretName101 ( talk) 19:55, 23 July 2023 (UTC) reply

Since you have restored my edits, there is no need for me to rebut your statements. I'm glad of that.

— Trappist the monk ( talk) 21:54, 23 July 2023 (UTC) reply