This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
1985 Mexico City earthquake was a Geography and places good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake. | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Added references to the Cocos Plate subduction zone and liquefaction. Added link to pictures at National Geophysical Data Center.
I could not verify the comments below and removed them. If the comments can be substantiated, please reinstate with citations.
I removed the following comment because my sources indicated it was incorrect - the epicenter was off the coast.
Dougz1 18:05, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
Both external links in this article return 404 errors. I don't have time to search for the new links at the moment - will try to get back soon to do it, but if someone else feels inclined to make the changes before then, feel free. Ahrie ( talk) 16:30, 19 May 2008 (UTC)
Please dont freak out... I put a lot of work into the rewrite of this page. Still needs work... Because I have verifiable sources for the info... I put in that the army was protecting factories and factory equipment instead of workers and that many buildings fell because of bad construction. However, I have issues with both of these assertions. For the first, my boyfriend (a Mexican who lived thru the quake) disputes the issue with the Army.. saying that while there might have been cases of this... he doubts it was widespread as the army has a fairly good reputation here. For the second... all the sources I found that push the idea of corruption causing non-compliance and shoddy construction comes from social science sources, not scientific ones. The scientific ones push the fact that it was a really unusually strong quake and more building should have fallen. Will keep looking. Thelmadatter ( talk) 14:25, 7 October 2008 (UTC)
Royally reworked... hard to find information in Mexico.... amazingly... had no problems getting information "everybody knew", like the destruction of the garment factory, but when it came to getting citable sources, another matter! Thelmadatter ( talk) 17:05, 11 October 2008 (UTC)
I believe this article deserves at least a C-class. I don't think it is GA or anything of the sort, but C would seem fine. Does anyone have any other comments? > RUL3R> trolling> vandalism 07:06, 31 December 2009 (UTC)
So the article says that the quake was some distance away from Mexico City, but because the underlying ground had a 2.5-second resonant frequency, the earthquake waves were amplified significantly. Does this mean that the earthquake (as felt in Mexico City) wasn't the typical shaking and rattling but was rather a slow rolling oscillation? - Rolypolyman ( talk) 15:07, 6 November 2010 (UTC)
Survivors mentioned it being more like ocean waves than anything. People mentioned getting seasick. There was a good doc. about it called Great Quakes: Mexico. It goes into some detail about it. (I think it might be on youtube). 69.122.132.127 ( talk) 17:46, 6 December 2010 (UTC)
WhisperToMe ( talk) 05:43, 7 December 2010 (UTC)
During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!
-- JeffGBot ( talk) 06:24, 24 June 2011 (UTC)
During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!
-- JeffGBot ( talk) 06:24, 24 June 2011 (UTC)
During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!
-- JeffGBot ( talk) 06:25, 24 June 2011 (UTC)
During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!
-- JeffGBot ( talk) 06:25, 24 June 2011 (UTC)
During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!
-- JeffGBot ( talk) 06:25, 24 June 2011 (UTC)
I think that one of the highlights of the March 20th Earthquake in Mexico was that, even that the scale was high (7.4 Richter scale) and the movement was different than 1985 earthquake, the factors of prevention helped to avoid catastrophic consecuences on this earthquake such as the measures to create more resistent buildings and the culture of prevention input since 1985 earthquake. Coincidentally, following this culture of prevention, the students of Chiapas state were out of their classrooms in a routine earthquake simulation when the real earthquake hit the country. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 208.99.166.84 ( talk) 20:28, 21 March 2012 (UTC)
Why the english version states that the magnitude was 8.0, while mexican sources state it was 8.1? -- Alfacevedoa ( My Talk) 14:05 19 sep 2012 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on 1985 Mexico City earthquake. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.
Cheers.— cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 12:40, 15 April 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on 1985 Mexico City earthquake. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 09:23, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on 1985 Mexico City earthquake. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 09:51, 30 November 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on 1985 Mexico City earthquake. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 05:22, 22 May 2017 (UTC)
V/H/S 85 (2023) just featured the earthquake and, while the ending is supernatural, I find it very on-point and poignant to create empathy for how devastating an earthquake can really be, in popular culture. I feel like there are so many earthquakes in the past few months that have killed 10s of thousands and there is not enough real awareness for what one looks like inside as it is happening.
I think some may see it as callous or disrespectful to the dead, but I personally was moved to tears at its depiction and desperation. Perhaps consider adding a section that mentions its reference? Also the notion of real-life / realistic horror (being inside a collapsing building) is notable/empathy-driving. 2601:988:180:1010:A914:D345:7309:FD11 ( talk) 22:03, 12 October 2023 (UTC)
This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
1985 Mexico City earthquake was a Geography and places good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake. | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Added references to the Cocos Plate subduction zone and liquefaction. Added link to pictures at National Geophysical Data Center.
I could not verify the comments below and removed them. If the comments can be substantiated, please reinstate with citations.
I removed the following comment because my sources indicated it was incorrect - the epicenter was off the coast.
Dougz1 18:05, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
Both external links in this article return 404 errors. I don't have time to search for the new links at the moment - will try to get back soon to do it, but if someone else feels inclined to make the changes before then, feel free. Ahrie ( talk) 16:30, 19 May 2008 (UTC)
Please dont freak out... I put a lot of work into the rewrite of this page. Still needs work... Because I have verifiable sources for the info... I put in that the army was protecting factories and factory equipment instead of workers and that many buildings fell because of bad construction. However, I have issues with both of these assertions. For the first, my boyfriend (a Mexican who lived thru the quake) disputes the issue with the Army.. saying that while there might have been cases of this... he doubts it was widespread as the army has a fairly good reputation here. For the second... all the sources I found that push the idea of corruption causing non-compliance and shoddy construction comes from social science sources, not scientific ones. The scientific ones push the fact that it was a really unusually strong quake and more building should have fallen. Will keep looking. Thelmadatter ( talk) 14:25, 7 October 2008 (UTC)
Royally reworked... hard to find information in Mexico.... amazingly... had no problems getting information "everybody knew", like the destruction of the garment factory, but when it came to getting citable sources, another matter! Thelmadatter ( talk) 17:05, 11 October 2008 (UTC)
I believe this article deserves at least a C-class. I don't think it is GA or anything of the sort, but C would seem fine. Does anyone have any other comments? > RUL3R> trolling> vandalism 07:06, 31 December 2009 (UTC)
So the article says that the quake was some distance away from Mexico City, but because the underlying ground had a 2.5-second resonant frequency, the earthquake waves were amplified significantly. Does this mean that the earthquake (as felt in Mexico City) wasn't the typical shaking and rattling but was rather a slow rolling oscillation? - Rolypolyman ( talk) 15:07, 6 November 2010 (UTC)
Survivors mentioned it being more like ocean waves than anything. People mentioned getting seasick. There was a good doc. about it called Great Quakes: Mexico. It goes into some detail about it. (I think it might be on youtube). 69.122.132.127 ( talk) 17:46, 6 December 2010 (UTC)
WhisperToMe ( talk) 05:43, 7 December 2010 (UTC)
During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!
-- JeffGBot ( talk) 06:24, 24 June 2011 (UTC)
During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!
-- JeffGBot ( talk) 06:24, 24 June 2011 (UTC)
During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!
-- JeffGBot ( talk) 06:25, 24 June 2011 (UTC)
During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!
-- JeffGBot ( talk) 06:25, 24 June 2011 (UTC)
During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!
-- JeffGBot ( talk) 06:25, 24 June 2011 (UTC)
I think that one of the highlights of the March 20th Earthquake in Mexico was that, even that the scale was high (7.4 Richter scale) and the movement was different than 1985 earthquake, the factors of prevention helped to avoid catastrophic consecuences on this earthquake such as the measures to create more resistent buildings and the culture of prevention input since 1985 earthquake. Coincidentally, following this culture of prevention, the students of Chiapas state were out of their classrooms in a routine earthquake simulation when the real earthquake hit the country. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 208.99.166.84 ( talk) 20:28, 21 March 2012 (UTC)
Why the english version states that the magnitude was 8.0, while mexican sources state it was 8.1? -- Alfacevedoa ( My Talk) 14:05 19 sep 2012 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on 1985 Mexico City earthquake. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.
Cheers.— cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 12:40, 15 April 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on 1985 Mexico City earthquake. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 09:23, 15 September 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on 1985 Mexico City earthquake. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 09:51, 30 November 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on 1985 Mexico City earthquake. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 05:22, 22 May 2017 (UTC)
V/H/S 85 (2023) just featured the earthquake and, while the ending is supernatural, I find it very on-point and poignant to create empathy for how devastating an earthquake can really be, in popular culture. I feel like there are so many earthquakes in the past few months that have killed 10s of thousands and there is not enough real awareness for what one looks like inside as it is happening.
I think some may see it as callous or disrespectful to the dead, but I personally was moved to tears at its depiction and desperation. Perhaps consider adding a section that mentions its reference? Also the notion of real-life / realistic horror (being inside a collapsing building) is notable/empathy-driving. 2601:988:180:1010:A914:D345:7309:FD11 ( talk) 22:03, 12 October 2023 (UTC)