Daily pageviews of this article A graph should have been displayed here but graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at pageviews.wmcloud.org

	1975 Cricket World Cup has been listed as one of the Sports and recreation good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones Date Process Result March 6, 2020 Good article nominee Listed
	A fact from this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the " On this day..." column on June 7, 2021.

This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Cricket Mid‑importance This article is part of WikiProject Cricket which aims to expand and organise information better in articles related to the sport of cricket. Please participate by visiting the project and talk pages for more details.CricketWikipedia:WikiProject CricketTemplate:WikiProject Cricketcricket articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. WikiProject Cricket To-do list: history watch purge Article assessment Check Category:Unassessed cricket articles for class and Category:Unknown-importance cricket articles for importance: see Assessment Department for details Verifiability Update fair and unfair play, fast bowling, first-class cricket, googly, innings, leg break, limited overs cricket, not out, Pakistan Cricket Board, spin bowling, underarm bowling, wicket, and other fundamental articles classified by the WikiProject as high-importance so that they meet WP:Verifiability policy standards Cleanup There is a toolserver based WikiProject Cricket cleanup list that automatically updates weekly to show all articles covered by this project which are marked with cleanup tags. (also available in one big list and in CSV format) Infoboxes Add infoboxes to the player articles found at Wikipedia:WikiProject Cricket/requested infoboxes Cricket people Create articles about 19th century players who are listed in Wikipedia:WikiProject Cricket/19th century players Create biographies about Bangladeshi players from the task force redlink list Check the listing of key bios at Wikipedia:WikiProject Cricket/Key biographies and improve these to at least B-class. Create batting/bowling graphs for cricketers who have excelled in international cricket. Create articles for redlinks present here and here Cricket teams & countries Domestic cricket coverage is needed for Bangladesh, Canada, Kenya, Pakistan, Sri Lanka and Zimbabwe; Create articles from redlinks and improve existing articles in List of current first-class cricket teams; National cricket teams; Under-19 national cricket teams Create articles about cricket in these missing countries Create or expand articles on international tours from items in Wikipedia:WikiProject Cricket/summary of international tour articles Create a link as such on Template:Cr-Aus/doc for Cricket Australia XI Images Add pictures (and remove template from address requests) in these Category:Wikipedia requested images of cricket people Add pictures for grounds missing photos from here On this day in cricket Expand the anniversary coverage for Portal:Cricket at Portal:Cricket/Anniversaries Umpires Expand ICC International umpire panel; ICC Elite referee panel; ICC Associates and Affiliates umpire panel Women Expand Women's cricket, Women's Test cricket and articles about women's cricket generally especially biographies and tours Update A number of lists need to be updated, can be found in Template:International cricketers and Template:National cricket captains Regularly updating cricketers' career stats. Other Export all cricket terms present in List of cricket terms to Wiktionary England Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Guild of Copy Editors This article was copy edited by Twofingered Typist, a member of the Guild of Copy Editors, on 5 January 2020.Guild of Copy EditorsWikipedia:WikiProject Guild of Copy EditorsTemplate:WikiProject Guild of Copy EditorsGuild of Copy Editors articles

This article was created or improved during the " The 20,000 Challenge: UK and Ireland", which started on 20 August 2016 and is still open. You can help!

No 'Man of the Series' was awarded in 1975, 1979, 1983 and 1987. The first was awarded in 1993. The award was changed to 'Player of the Tournament' in 1999 and then to 'Player of the Series' in 2003 - Ctbolt 02:26, 29 April 2007 (UTC) reply

This article is written like it is a fifa event. in ICC evets there is no quallifying from confederation. test teams qualify automatically while other teams qualify through the ICC trophy so please notify who qualified automatically and who did not. aklso the score tables are complete bullshit. in football u have 2-1 in cricket you dont win by 93-94/6 rus. you should look at the other cricket wc articles —Preceding unsigned comment added by 123.49.42.131 ( talk) 05:02, 10 July 2010 (UTC) reply

So what if it is written like a Fifa event, same tournament, different sport. Cricket is decided on the team with the most runs so what's your problem?-- Blackknight12 ( talk) 14:41, 10 July 2010 (UTC) reply

 My problem is fifa WC participants dont qualify from ACA orACa . two ACAs my first problem. 2ndly the participants should be arranged accordingto test or non tests .the confederations listed here have played little part in Qualifications if any  —Preceding 
unsigned comment added by 
123.49.42.131 (
talk) 15:36, 11 July 2010 (UTC)
reply 

Can't we merge the Group A, Group B & Knockout stage pages in the main article like the other world cup articles. they dont look very useful. it's really messy this way. — Preceding unsigned comment added by AnmolShrivastava ( talk • contribs) 19:16, 20 January 2011 (UTC) reply

I have changed it to americas and africa so the reader is better able to differiantiate between the 2 ACAs

in the "team ranking" section in the end, it says NZ won 3 matches and lost 1. i think they won 2 and lost 2. can somebody confirm this and make it right. — Preceding unsigned comment added by AnmolShrivastava ( talk • contribs) 13:09, 24 January 2011 (UTC) reply

Done. Thanks for that.-- Blackknight12 ( talk) 23:07, 24 January 2011 (UTC) reply

This review is transcluded from Talk:1975 Cricket World Cup/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: MWright96 ( talk · contribs) 12:59, 12 February 2020 (UTC) reply

Will review. MWright96 (talk) 12:59, 12 February 2020 (UTC) reply

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b ( MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a ( reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c ( OR):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a ( major aspects): b ( focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b ( appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

Lead

• "was the first edition" - how about inagural to avoid close reptition of the word "first"
• "plus leading Associate nations" - better and the two leading Associate nations
• "The teams were divided into two groups of four, with each team playing the other teams" - too many mention of the word "teams"
• "all were played during the day and hence started early." - played and ended in daylight.
• "while the West Indies finished top of Group B" - top of the Group B table
• Wikilink runs and wickets to the appropriate articles for those unfamiliar with cricket

Background

• "The first multilateral competition at international level" - Should it not be made clear that it was a cricket tournament to set the scene?
• "But the weather and public antipathy saw the concept of the tournament scrapped after only one edition." - better; The concept was later dropped because of inclement weather and a lack of public interest.
• "The first instance of a one-day match to occur was in 1962" - more concise; The first one-day match occurred in 1962
• Wikilink wicket, over, deliveries and balls to their appropriate articles to help non-cricket readers
• "This was due to the deluge of rain" - a deluge
• "Australia chased down the target" - I believe the text in bold is somewhat informal
• "Two years later at Lord's during the 1973 Women's Cricket World Cup, plans were made for a men's tournament to take place in 1975 which involved all the test nations at the time in two group stages with the top two in each group qualifying for the semi-final before the final at Lord's." - Think that this section of text could be made into two sentences

Format

• "The format of the 1975 Cricket World Cup had the eight teams split into two groups of four teams, with each team playing all the other teams in their group." - too many uses of the word "team" in close proximity in one sentence. Can it be reworked a little?

Venues

• "The rest of the venues were revealed on 5 November 1974 with the scheduling for the 1975 Prudential Cup" - wouldn't event suffice in place of the text in bold?

Preparations

• "Heading into the first Cricket World Cup, Ladbrokes betting agency" - the Ladbrokes betting agency
• "Before the tournament, the teams played in a few warm-up matches" - How many matches specially?
• "to get used to the conditions" - more formal; acquaint themselves with
• "East Africa,[9] Sri Lanka[10] and" - a comma is missing after "Lanka" and "[10]"
• Wikilink wide to Wide (cricket) for non-cricket readers
  • This issue has not been addressed as of now. MWright96 (talk) 20:18, 25 February 2020 (UTC) reply
• "the ICC declared in a unanimous decision that any of the balls that went over a batsman's head to be a called a wide" - would be called wide

Group stage: Summary

• Wikilink innings for readers unfamiliar with cricket
• "The West Indies took a nine-wicket victory over Sri Lanka as the Sri Lankans became the first team" - try to avoid reptition of Sri Lankans as a similar word
• "as The Daily Telegraph stated that they might not have many new admirers with their short ball stuff" - It would be benefical to include the author of The Daily Telegraph in this sentence
• "The other match in Group A saw only 720 people pay to see India" - more formal; saw 720 specators observe
• Keith Fletcher does not need to be linked twice in this section
• "and going top of the group" - either top of the group table or to the lead of the group table would suffice
• "as the West Indies finished top" - top of the table
• "the West Indies took on Australia to see who would go top of Group B." - either who would take the lead of the Group B table. or would go to the top of the Group B table. would be better
• "The other match in Group A saw England clench an overwhelming victory" - the word "overwhelming" is not neutral and will have to be replaced or removed

Semi-finals

• "as they chased the remaining runs to book Australia's spot." - more formal; earn Australia a berth in the final.
• "produce hostility for New Zealand" - I believe there is a better method to write this portion of text but am not able to conjure it up.

Final

• "The 1975 final saw the match sold out three days before the 21 June event." - better; The final match on 21 June was sold out three days beforehand.
• "would go on to score 291 for eight wickets from their 60 overs" - "their" is redundant
• "After being given a life from a Ross Edwards dropped chance at mid-wicket" - not sure what is meant my a life in this regard
• "brought hope. But it was not to be." - I don't believe this portion of text is encyclopedic in the slighest. Please reword to make it formal
• "The West Indies won by 17 runs as they claimed their first title on what was the longest day of the year." - Am unsure as to why that it was the longest day of the year had any affect on the final

Statistics

• "Glenn Turner ended the tournament as the leading run scorer for the 1975 edition" - "for the 1975 edition" is redundant because you're already refering to the tournament earlier in this portion of text
• "Australian player, Gary Gilmour" - Gary Gilmour of Australia
• "In second place was English player, Dennis Amiss" - the comma highlighted in bold is unecessary here
• "Bernard Julien and Keith Boyce (both from the West Indies)" - better; The West Indies duo of Bernard Julien and Keith Boyce
  • Haven't seen any action taken to address these issues after my previous inspection. MWright96 (talk) 20:04, 25 February 2020 (UTC) reply

References

• Reference 2 should be ESPNcricinfo not Cricinfo
• Reference 6 should have ESPNcricinfo as the publisher not the work
• Reference 15 is missing the author who wrote the article and the page number it is located on

Overall the main issues concerning this article is the way that some of the prose is presented to the general reader and the tone that it is written in. There are other issues with the formatting of referencing. Will put on hold for the time being. MWright96 (talk) 15:44, 12 February 2020 (UTC) reply

@ MWright96: I have gone through the list that has been set, I will need to add a little bit about the Canadian trip that Australia had before the tournament as they were the only team that didn't have any warm-ups in England with their warm-up being in Canada. HawkAussie ( talk) 11:22, 23 February 2020 (UTC) reply

And they have been added, HawkAussie ( talk) 11:18, 24 February 2020 (UTC) reply

@ MWright96: Any update on this review? HawkAussie ( talk) 03:28, 6 March 2020 (UTC) reply

• @ HawkAussie: Now promoting to GA class. I have made changes to the prose of the article and added wikilinks for non-Cricket readers. MWright96 (talk) 06:21, 6 March 2020 (UTC) reply

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Cricket World Cup which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. — RMCD bot 22:17, 16 February 2021 (UTC) reply