This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Weather: Tropical / Eastern Pacific Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Weather, which collaborates on weather and related subjects on Wikipedia. To participate, help improve this article or visit the project page for details. Articles Requested Project Resources Become a Member Project Talk Assessment A-Class Alerts WeatherWikipedia:WikiProject WeatherTemplate:WikiProject WeatherWeather articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject Tropical cyclones (assessed as Mid-importance). This article is supported by the Pacific hurricane work group (assessed as Mid-importance).

	1972 Pacific hurricane season was a Natural sciences good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Article milestones Date Process Result August 15, 2009 Good article nominee Not listed

It needs at least a one sentence description of every storm to be a start.-- Nilfanion ( talk) 09:38, 9 June 2006 (UTC) reply

This review is transcluded from Talk:1972 Pacific hurricane season/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

I am failing this article as the article is poorly formated and doesnt meet the critera i apply to season articles and needs a massive cleanup.

Celeste's area is too big 2-3 paragraphs should be sufficent but no more.

Each depression should have an infobox and a trackmap at the very least.

The main Infobox has an error.

Split the timeline off and the seasonal summuary from the storms section and make its /

The depressions need to be added to the Infobox

There are parts which are not neutral -ie "Of note is the fact that on November 17, Ruby had a central pressure of 983 mb (983 hPa), which is surprisingly high for a 100-knot typhoon."

Also i have spotted a dead link.

As a result i think this doesnt meet the critera for a GA and i do not think you can get it up to standards in 7 days Jason Rees ( talk) 20:06, 15 August 2009 (UTC) reply

The depressions are in the infobox. Cyclonebiskit fixed the infobox. I moved the timeline to the end and split it from the storms section. I changed the offending sentence in Ruby. Celeste's section now has three paragraphs; I kept it at three because the first paragraph is about the MH, second impact, third records. Where's the deadlink? I still have to get track maps made.

I'd like to point out that it is still August 18. This is less than a week since you quickfailed the GA Nom. Since I fixed most of the issues within a week, (even when taking my sweet time to get started). I am not going to renominate this article, but I'd like to suggest not quickfailing my noms for the reasons used to justify quickfailing this one. Thank you. Miss Madeline | Talk to Madeline 03:18, 19 August 2009 (UTC) reply

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

• http://aupress.au.af.mil/CADRE_Papers/PDF_Bin/chun.pdf
  • In 1972 Pacific hurricane season on 2011-05-25 04:14:17, 404 Not Found
  • In 1972 Pacific hurricane season on 2011-06-06 15:15:05, 404 Not Found

-- JeffGBot ( talk) 15:15, 6 June 2011 (UTC) reply

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

• http://www.thehurricanearchive.com/Viewer.aspx?img=81883690_clean&firstvisit=true&src=search&currentResult=0&currentPage=0
  • In 1972 Pacific hurricane season on 2011-06-06 15:15:07, 404 Not Found
  • In 1972 Pacific hurricane season on 2011-06-24 04:26:40, 404 Not Found

-- JeffGBot ( talk) 04:26, 24 June 2011 (UTC) reply

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

• http://www.thehurricanearchive.com/Viewer.aspx?img=46451698_clean&firstvisit=true&src=search&currentResult=9&currentPage=0
  • In 1972 Pacific hurricane season on 2011-06-06 15:15:07, 404 Not Found
  • In 1972 Pacific hurricane season on 2011-06-24 04:26:40, 404 Not Found

-- JeffGBot ( talk) 04:26, 24 June 2011 (UTC) reply

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on 1972 Pacific hurricane season. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110607012850/http://www.usno.navy.mil/NOOC/nmfc-ph/RSS/jtwc/atcr/1972atcr/pdf/annexa.pdf to http://www.usno.navy.mil/NOOC/nmfc-ph/RSS/jtwc/atcr/1972atcr/pdf/annexa.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{ source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 13:15, 15 June 2017 (UTC) reply