This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

United States: Ohio Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject Ohio (assessed as Low-importance). National Football League Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject National Football League, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the NFL on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.National Football LeagueWikipedia:WikiProject National Football LeagueTemplate:WikiProject National Football LeagueNational Football League articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Cleveland Low‑importance This article is within the scope of the WikiProject Cleveland, the scope of which includes Cleveland and the Greater Cleveland Area. If you would like to join us, please visit the project page; if you have any questions, please consult the FAQ.ClevelandWikipedia:WikiProject ClevelandTemplate:WikiProject ClevelandCleveland articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. American football Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject American football, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of American football on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.American footballWikipedia:WikiProject American footballTemplate:WikiProject American footballAmerican football articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Sports This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sports, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of sport-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SportsWikipedia:WikiProject SportsTemplate:WikiProject Sportssports articles To-do list: history watch purge Here are some tasks awaiting attention: Article requests : Requested articles (Sports) Requested articles (Association football) Requested articles (Association football women) Requested articles (Motor sports) Requested articles (Estonian sportspeople) Assess : newly added and existing articles, maybe nominate some good B-class articles for GA; independently assess some as A-class, regardless of GA status. Cleanup : * Sport governing body (this should-be-major article is in a shameful state) * Field hockey (History section needs sources and accurate information - very vague at the moment.) * Standardize Category:American college sports infobox templates to use same font size and spacing. * Sport in the United Kingdom - the Popularity section is incorrect and unsourced. Reliable data is required. * Fix project template and/or "to do list" Current version causes tables of content to be hidden unless/until reader chooses "show." Expand : Professional sports (crucial article explaining the salaried undertaking of sports) * Sport industry (currently a sub-stub) Photo : for pages listed in Category:Wikipedia requested images of sports and games and sub-categories. Stubs : work on articles in Category:Sports stubs Update : List of world sports championships Other : Translate the page of sport in each country from corresponding article in other language Wikipedia to English Wikipedia which was marked in red. Categorize: Gather all (major/ olympic) sports to be part of this project RfCs: answer requests for comment Ohio Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ohio, which collaborates on Ohio-related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to current discussions.OhioWikipedia:WikiProject OhioTemplate:WikiProject OhioOhio articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

	1946 Cleveland Browns season has been listed as one of the Sports and recreation good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones Date Process Result October 18, 2012 Good article nominee Listed

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

• http://www.clevelandbrowns.com/team/history/results/1946_stats.php
  • In 1946 Cleveland Browns season on 2011-05-25 03:19:56, 404 Not Found
  • In 1946 Cleveland Browns season on 2011-06-04 16:36:08, 404 Not Found

-- JeffGBot ( talk) 16:36, 4 June 2011 (UTC) reply

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

• http://web.archive.org/web/20061021102622/http://www.clevelandbrowns.com/team/history/results/1946_stats.php
  • In 1946 Cleveland Browns season on 2011-05-25 03:20:00, 404 Not Found
  • In 1946 Cleveland Browns season on 2011-06-04 16:36:12, 404 Not Found

-- JeffGBot ( talk) 16:36, 4 June 2011 (UTC) reply

This review is transcluded from Talk:1946 Cleveland Browns season/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Go Phightins! ( talk · contribs) 03:30, 17 October 2012 (UTC) I'll take a look in the coming days, but will start tomorrow, as I am too tired right now. reply

Thanks -- I'm here to answer any queries, as always. -- Batard0 ( talk) 08:51, 17 October 2012 (UTC) reply

Review

I'll just post some general thoughts as I go through.

Lead

Perhaps we could use a word other than "magnate"...I know what it means, but some might not. Entrepreneur, tycoon, I don't know.

• Changed to "tycoon". Thanks for the suggestion. -- Batard0 ( talk) 04:08, 18 October 2012 (UTC) reply

The attendance figure seems a little out of place; though that could just be me.

• It does. Removed. -- Batard0 ( talk) 04:08, 18 October 2012 (UTC) reply

Other pre-game summary sections

I think there may be a little too much on the founding of the AAFC rather than just the Cleveland Browns founding.

• Agreed. I shortened it considerably by removing a few sentences. -- Batard0 ( talk) 04:08, 18 October 2012 (UTC) reply

What positions did the two reserves play?

• Added (tackle and guard). -- Batard0 ( talk) 04:08, 18 October 2012 (UTC) reply

The rest

Is there a reason that in the season table, some of the teams are linked and some aren't? Do the un-linked ones not have Wikipedia pages?

• All the teams have wikipedia pages. I linked them all. I think the reason some weren't linked was that they had appeared earlier in the table, but I think it does look slightly awkward to have some as links and some not. -- Batard0 ( talk) 04:08, 18 October 2012 (UTC) reply

I'm not a big fan of the week four summary starting with the ticket prices, I feel like that should be at the end of the summary or in a separate section.

• Moved to the end. -- Batard0 ( talk) 04:08, 18 October 2012 (UTC) reply

References

I know I've said this before, and I know it's hard, but honestly, some non-Piascik references would be nice. I understand they provide comprehensive coverage, but it just seems the more the merrier in terms of sources.

• I will try to find some more -- there are a limited number of sources I know about that cover the season in depth, but I'll see what I can do in the next day or so on this point. -- Batard0 ( talk) 04:08, 18 October 2012 (UTC) reply

Final thoughts

Well, as usual, you've invested the time and effort into getting this up to almost GA status, and I'm inclined to accept pending the slight modifications suggested above. Keep up the good work!

• Thanks much for the review -- great suggestions and improvements, as always. -- Batard0 ( talk) 04:08, 18 October 2012 (UTC) reply

I've listed

Congrats on another GA. Go Phightins ! 20:11, 18 October 2012 (UTC) reply